Vaccine Passports: Gateway to Mass Surveillance | 1st webinar
Are “Vaccine Passports” merely a convenient way of showing that someone is vaccinated, or could they be used to restrict rights to freedom and privacy guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution? Vaccine Passports are not merely the digital equivalent of the yellow vaccine cards long used in international travel. According to tech experts, the digital platform used by Vaccine Passports is the same platform used by the “Chinese Social Credit System.” It can be used to track and control nearly every aspect of our lives. No matter your opinion on the Covid vaccines — some of us are vaccinated and some are not — such a digital passport system is clearly antithetical to the foundational principles of this country and must not be allowed to take root here.
On the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party of China, join us for an in-depth discussion on the dangers lurking behind vaccine passports and their similarities to the Chinese social credit system.
Military Vaccine Mandates: a National Security Catastrophe | 2nd Webinar
A national security catastrophe looms large as fallout from the Department of Defense’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate threatens to upend U.S. military readiness.
About one-in-five U.S. service members – hundreds of thousands of troops – have not received a single dose as of mid-October reports Voice of America, less than three weeks out from the first of the military’s vaccination compliance dates, which vary according to service branches. Members of the military who refuse the vaccine face severe consequences, including being blocked from deployment, relief of command, dishonorable discharge and even court martial. In September, Just the News reported nearly 25% of Navy SEALs were unvaccinated and faced suspension. And, in an unconfirmed report, 22 U.S. F-22 military pilots and 16 crew members for B-52s walked off the job due to COVID-19 vaccine mandates which the military denies. U.S. service members are publicly denouncing the mandate and quitting as a result — leaving behind decades-long careers, well-earned entitlements, and pensions.
Some have religious reasons to refuse the vaccines; others are not convinced they are safe. Many have already recovered from the virus and claim natural immunity. Some were previously injured by the military’s forced experimental Anthrax vaccines from 1998-2000.
While religious and medical exemptions are proffered, they are difficult to obtain. Senior commanders who refuse the vaccines, or seek exemptions, are most at risk for demotions and other serious punishment.
Meanwhile, the list of people who have suffered serious adverse effects, likely from the vaccine, continues to grow on the government’s own voluntary Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Victims who believe they were injured by the vaccines are routinely ignored, censored, and accused of spreading misinformation by the very institutions and agencies tasked with investigating their claims. And, European countries responding to reports of myocarditis in vaccinated, previously healthy, young men and boys, are pulling back on vaccines for the under 30 cohorts.
Our expert panelists will discuss how these mandates pose catastrophic risks to U.S. service members, military readiness, and national security.
Vaccine Mandates for Children: Child Abuse? | 3rd Webinar
An important conversation on COVID-19 vaccine mandates for children, including uncensored accounts of those who have suffered serious injuries from the jab
On October 25, an FDA Advisory Panel endorsed the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children ages 5-11 years. They took this action despite presentations by experts, who raised concerns over both the lack of safety and efficacy of the jabs and the nearly 140k comments received from the public, with many opposed to the expansion of vaccines to young children. According to the CDC’s own website, for example, “Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) have occurred: After mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults.”
Based on CDC’s own data, the risk of death from COVID for children is extremely low. Why vaccinate them? Pfizer argued children should be vaccinated to prevent transmission – to whom? – to adults? Is this latest vaccine volley intended to protect adults at the expense of our children?
“We’re never going to know how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s the way it is,” explained Dr. Eric Ruben, who sits on the FDA Advisory Panel.
The FDA has yet formally to authorize the vaccine, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) must also weigh-in with its own recommendation. If approved, which it is expected to do in early November, states like California will immediately begin to make the inoculations mandatory for schools — leaving little room for religious accommodations or medical exemptions.
And, reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine have been suppressed. Where censorship exists, how can consent be informed? The voices of those injured by the vaccine need to be heard.
The administration and its agencies state that the vaccines are proven safe and effective. Without long term studies, how can they know? Why, if children are least at risk, should they be subjected to gene therapies which may indeed injure them or affect their fertility?
The government is forcing new therapies onto children — therapies with questionable records of safety and rushed to market on an emergency basis, short-circuiting much of the usual testing for safety and efficacy. The stated goal is protecting the nation’s elderly and infirm. Is this a form of pharmaceutical child abuse?
Emergency shortcuts amid a pandemic may make sense for immunocompromised and the elderly. But for children aged 5 to 11years, the risk associated with COVID-19 is very low. According to the CDC, out of 737,990 COVID-19 deaths in America, only 455 have been reported in the 0-18 year-old category as of October 27, measuring only .06 percent of deaths. The CDC has not reported whether these young people who died with COVID had co-morbidities, such as cancer, heart disease or diabetes. Nor has the CDC reported whether these children died of COVID, or merely with COVID.
VAERS shows the number of people with possible adverse reactions including death, blood clots, heart issues, and much more, has far surpassed that of all previous vaccines. At any other time, these vaccines would have been pulled from the market. Instead, people who claim to have been injured by the vaccines are ignored, ridiculed, and censored from telling their stories.
Natural Immunity Matters: Follow the REAL Science | 4th Webinar
On Tuesday, Dec. 14, Stop Vax Passports task force held an important discussion regarding the impact of natural immunity denial by government agencies and their bureaucracies as we looked at what may be the catalyst behind the drive to vaccinate every man, woman, and child walking the earth — profit, power, and control — as they endeavor to introduce digitized tracking technologies and health-based social credit systems exported, like the virus, by Communist China. We peered into the COVID Tyranny of Melbourne, Australia. We heard from those bravely resisting this tyranny through legal battles and taking action at the state level.
This Stop Vax Passports task force webinar was moderated by Frank Gaffney, vice-chair for the Committee on the Present Danger: China, and hosted by Reggie Littlejohn, Founder and President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers.
The U.S. Government and the Centers for Disease Control have consistently refused to recognize the validity — indeed, the inconvenient truth — of natural immunity gained by those who have recovered from a COVID-19 infection. Instead, they insist on a seemingly endless round of vaccines and boosters as the only way forward towards herd immunity and an end to the pandemic.
Meanwhile, the real science shows that current available vaccines do not stop infection or transmission. Rather, natural immunity is stronger and more durable than vaccination. These facts have been jettisoned to justify political and profit-driven directives aimed at increasing vaccination rates — and related expansion of public health emergency powers — at all costs.
Those who have previously recovered from COVID-19, are being shamed, marginalized, and punished by policy makers and public health agents. Some are losing their job, are unable to attend school, and even being denied organ transplants. Health officials wrongly promote any spike in COVID cases as a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” These politicians and unelected bureaucrats willfully deny the growing body of scientific studies showing natural immunity is indeed stronger and more robust in protecting against severe disease and hospitalization than are the vaccines currently available.
When the numbers of vaccinated are added to those with natural immunity, will the population of the United States have reached “herd immunity?” If so, would the basis of “Emergency Powers” — wielded to take away our rights – be removed? Could Natural Immunity Denial be a necessary precondition to justify vaccine mandates and digital passports? Is coercion via vaccine mandate preparing us for coercion in other areas of our lives? Is discrimination against the unvaccinated part of an “Othering” campaign that will lead to internment camps for the unvaccinated in the U.S., similar to what is happening in areas of Australia? Are we drifting into bio-tech medical tyranny?
COVID Mandates: Crushing the Faithful | 5th Webinar
An important discussion on Christians and COVID-19 mandates, passports, religious accommodations, and the government’s tracking of religious objectors.
COVID Mandates: Destroying the Military & Deep Sixing the Evidence | 6th Webinar
An important update to our earlier discussion of COVID-19 vaccine mandates from the U.S. Military, which continue despite significant evidence of the detrimental effects the vaccines are having on our military members, as revealed in a January 24, 2022 panel on Capitol Hill hosted by Sen. Ron Johnson.
In testimony from Attorney Tom Renz [begins 13:03] declared at least three whistleblowers from the Department of Defense had data mined DMED, the Defense Department vaccine injury database, and found massive increases in year over year vaccine injuries. The whistleblowers said data had been manipulated and altered after they found the original discovery in August. Senator Johnson sent an immediate letter to preserve documents in the matter to DOD.
The whistleblowers report data found in August showed a 20x or higher in some cases increase in severe reactions to the COVID shots. Later, the data had been adjusted to show only 2x for myocarditis specifically. Miscarriages were up 300% over the 5 year average. Cancers were up 300% over the 5 year average. Neurological injuries showed a 1000% increase. Attorney Renz declared our soldiers are being experimented on, injured, and in some cases killed. Renz said on 9/28/21, Project Sales, a DOD initiative, provided data to the CDC which showed “71% of new cases were fully vaxed, 60% hospitalizations fully vaxed”.
DIGITAL GULAG: Vaccine Passports, “Disinformation”, and a Cashless Society | 7th Webinar
“Digital Gulag: Vaccine Passports, ‘Disinformation’, and a Cashless Society” examines how Americans are at extreme risk of losing basic freedoms to centralized digital platforms controlled by state bureaucrats and corporate enablers. Freedom of movement, association, speech, bodily autonomy, thought, privacy, and private property are all threatened. We welcome you to join us for this urgent and thought-provoking program.
Stop the Sellout of US Sovereignty to the WHO | 8th webinar
The Biden administration has initiated the greatest voluntary surrender of our national sovereignty since our Republic was founded.
At a meeting of the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland between the 22nd and 28th of May, U.S.-proposed amendments will be adopted that would make the director-general of the WHO the sole arbiter of what is a “public health emergency of international concern” and dictate how our government and others must respond to it.
The WHO seriously mishandled the COVID-19 pandemic, promoting the lies of the Chinese Communist Party, which lies caused the deaths of millions. Do you want these same non-elected incompetents telling the U.S. how to handle the next pandemic? The WHO could force the U.S. to vaccinate everyone, force mask mandates, lockdowns, and quarantines.
Also, the term “Public Health Emergency” is ill-defined and could include not only a viral pandemic but also a rise in crime rates, climate change, or any other issue that arguably may affect “public health.” Further, the attempt to slip this surrender of sovereignty through quietly as a series of amendments to the current International Health Regulations constitutes an attempt to subvert the treaty process, thus performing an end-run around our legislature and the legislatures of the world.
The Digital Gulag at Davos and the WHO: The Fight Continues | 9th webinar
The globalists at Davos and the World Health Organization continue to build out the Digital Gulag of the Great Reset. In meetings hosted in Geneva earlier this month it was revealed that the WHO has contracted with Deutsche Telecom and its subsidiary, T-Systems, for the development of a global vaccine passport platform. And, at Davos, the World Economic Forum showcased plans for a global carbon footprint tracker. Both tools are gateways to mass surveillance and social credit systems modeled on Communist China’s brutal and Draconian system of population control.
We will also have updates to the ongoing fight against amendments to the International Health Regulations. What actually happened at the World Health Assembly and to the Amendments proposed by the Biden Administration that would damage our national sovereignty? What is the new “Pandemic Treaty,” and does it pose a similar threat?
COVID Jabs: They’re Coming for Your Babies! | 10th webinar
On June 28, the FDA approved COVID-19 injections for babies and children as young as six months old, under an Emergency Use Authorization. The FDA did this despite the fact that healthy infants and children of this age are at virtually no risk of hospitalization or death from COVID. Meanwhile, no data exists regarding how the injections might affect long-term immune function, fertility, or possible cardiac issues, such as myocarditis. No data exists regarding whether injecting a COVID-recovered child could compromise that child’s natural immunity, or worse, cause potentially deadly antibody-dependent enhancement, or ADE.
What is the point of this irrational approval to inject babies? Is it part of a larger plan to get COVID injections on the childhood vaccination schedule, in order to shield vaccine manufacturers from liability for injury and death, for any age group? Or, is it a pretext to issue vaccine passports/smart health cards/digital health IDs to babies and young children, so that they may be tracked and surveilled from infancy? Vaccine passports may be used as tools of mass surveillance and totalitarian control, similar to China’s Social Credit System.
COVID Injections and Women: Miscarriage, Infertility, and More | 11th webinar
According to experts such as Dr. James Thorp, COVID-19 injections have resulted in spikes in miscarriages, infertility and serious menstrual complications – yet these increases are difficult to quantify, because of claimed suppression in reporting of adverse events.
COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all people 6 months and older. This includes people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future.
What is the truth? Are these jabs “safe and effective,” or do they pose an unacceptable risk to women and their unborn children? Watch our webinar to hear from experts regarding the impact of COVID-19 injections on fertility, pregnant women, and on their unborn babies.
COVID Coercion and Fraud | 12th webinar
The CDC official website continues to claim that “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.” The CDC recommends injections “for everyone six months and older.” The website states that adverse events are “rare,” and that the “benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks.”
Yet, according to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as well as the insurance industry, since the rollout of the vaccines there has been a sharp spike in injury and all-cause mortality. According to OpenVAERS, as of September 2, 2022, there have been 30,796 deaths and 1,400,350 injuries after the COVID vaccine. These numbers, shocking as they are, likely represent a small portion of the true numbers of death and injuries. Meanwhile, all cause mortality has risen up to 40% over pre-pandemic levels.
How can we reconcile the CDC’s reassuring message with the grim statistics from VAERS and the insurance industry? Is the CDC ignorant of the facts — or are they and others hiding the truth? Has there been fraud?
Our panel of experts discuss their findings of alleged fraud, for example, in the design and implementation of vaccine trials, in the suppression of life-saving early treatment protocols, in the way that COVID-related deaths have been over-reported, in the way that vaccine-related deaths have been underreported, in the stamping out of evidence that COVID was leaked from a Wuhan lab, in the way that evidence of vaccine injuries has been swept under the rug, and in rampant conflicts of interest in our regulatory bodies, raising the specter of regulatory capture.
Was fraud used to induce, or even to coerce, individuals to submit to the injections via vaccine mandates? Lawsuits alleging injection-related fraud abound. If COVID injection manufacturers are convicted of fraud, the immunity they currently enjoy from liability for vaccine injuries and deaths would evaporate.
Efficiency or Enslavement? | 13th webinar
Smart Health Cards, Digital Drivers Licenses, and Central Bank Digital Currency
(Washington, D.C.) — Are we about to be trapped in a “digital gulag,” set by digital IDs and a Central Bank Digital Currency?
China’s Social Credit System – a formidable instrument of mass surveillance and totalitarian control – may be implemented in the United States and world-wide through any mandatory digital ID, including a vaccine passport, smart health card, or digital driver’s license. This is especially the case when combined with a Central Bank Digital Currency and a cashless society.
As the vaccine and mask mandates have been relaxed, the vaccine passport – sometimes deceptively re-labeled as a “smart health card” or “digital ID”— is being quietly rolled out in several states across our nation, as well as nations worldwide. Any mandatory digital ID can support the infrastructure to lock us down and remove our freedom during the next pandemic, or in service of some other goal, such as reducing our carbon footprint. Within minutes, these digital IDs can incorporate all the surveillance technology used in China’s Social Credit System.
In a cashless society, banks, credit card companies and authorities could track all our spending and sever us from our financial resources – as was done earlier this year by the Canadian government when truckers and their supporters suddenly found that they could not access their credit cards or bank accounts. A Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) can be “programmable”: it can be programmed to control the purchases of individuals, to reward or punish people for their social credit scores or their personal carbon footprint, or perhaps to effectuate so-called “climate reparations.”
In response to Executive Order 14067, the Biden Administration is actively evaluating whether to launch a CBDC. They have released the “First-Ever Comprehensive Framework for Responsible Development of Digital Assets.” The Bank of England, the International Monetary Fund, and Beijing, have all voiced ambitions to push CBDCs.
All this could become institutionalized and weaponized unless we understand what is afoot and take action now. This SVPTF webinar examines how Americans are at extreme risk of losing basic freedoms to centralized digital platforms controlled by government bureaucrats and corporate enablers. Freedom of movement, association, speech, bodily autonomy, thought, privacy, and private property are all threatened.
Digital Gulag: The WHO’s Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations | 14th webinar
Washington, D.C. — With scant coverage by the mainstream media, the World Health Organization appears to be attempting a major power grab by means of revising the International Health Regulations. If the proposed amendments currently under consideration are passed, our national and individual sovereignty are greatly at risk.
The proposed amendments would, for example:
- Eliminate the requirement that the WHO consult with a nation before taking action on a report of a potential health concern within that nation (Article 9)
- Obligate nations to “recognize WHO as the guidance and coordinating authority of international public health response,” giving WHO broad powers to require nations to follow its “guidance” (New Article 13A)
- Give State Parties power to issue “Passenger Locator Forms” for “the purposes of contact tracing” (Article 23, New 6)
- Give State Parties the ability to implement “an interoperability mechanism for secure global digital exchange of information . . . countering the dissemination of false and unreliable information . . .” in the media and social networks (Article 44, New D and New E).
- Establish an “Implementation Committee” and a “Compliance Committee” to monitor and facilitate compliance (Article 53A and New Chapter IV, Article 53 bis-quarter)
The changes would institute global digital health certificates, dramatically increase the billions of dollars available to the WHO, greatly expand surveillance and censorship of dissenting views, and enable nations to implement the regulations WITHOUT respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people.
Is the WHO being used to establish a Digital Gulag – a biotech totalitarian security state?
Agreement by a simple majority of the 194 member nations is all that is needed to adopt the amendments because, as amendments to an existing agreement, neither the advice and consent of the United States Senate, nor the signature of the President would be required.
The Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations is meeting behind closed doors January 9 to 13 to finalize these proposed amendments for consideration by the WHO. Their report is due on January 15.
Every Breath You Take: Big Brother’s Plan to Stalk You through the WHO | 15th webinar
The World Health Organization (WHO) is simultaneously negotiating two instruments: Amendments to the International Health Regulations and a new, so-called “WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response” — in reality, a treaty. These instruments could be voted on and adopted as early as May.
According to analysis of the most recent drafts published by the WHO, both of these instruments contain language which, if passed, establish a global biomedical surveillance state and seriously damage our national sovereignty. The WHO refuses to call either of the two documents “treaties” in an attempt to circumvent the treaty process.
Meanwhile, it has just come to light that, within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which passed in Congress in December, is another act that appears to have pre-approved whatever instruments are approved by the WHO. This “Act within an Act” is named the Global Health Security and International Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Act of 2022. It is found on page 950 of the 1772-page NDAA with a shortform title, which Biden signed into law on December 23, 2022.
“This International Pandemic Preparedness Act of 2022 cannot be constitutional,” said Reggie Littlejohn, attorney and co-chair of the Stop Vax Passports Taskforce referring to the shortform title for the act. “I doubt that most Congressional representatives are even aware that this pernicious Act — which completely circumvents Senate approval required by our treaty process — is hidden deep within the NDAA. According to Dr. Francis Boyle, a panelist on our upcoming program, Congress — likely unwittingly — has already given the WHO a greenlight for whatever instruments they pass, regardless of whether these international instruments impinge on our national sovereignty or personal freedom. American voters need to know that the International Pandemic Preparedness Act of 2022 gives carte blanche to the WHO to decide if they should be empowered unilaterally to impose all matter of public health emergency mandates on America and other nations, as well as be able to enforce those mandates through vast monitoring and compliance policies written into the documents. This is a global scheme to steal sovereignty from nation states, track citizens with digital IDs, restrict movement, censor free speech, and ultimately, destroy Western Civilization.”
In an effort to educate the public and alert representatives of the dangers of these instruments, which are being negotiated now and which could come up for a vote as soon as the World Health Assembly, May 20-30, 2023, the Stop Vax Passports Task Force (SVPTF), sponsored by the Committee on the Present Danger: China (CPDC) and Women’s Right’s Without Frontiers (WRWF), is hosting a panel of experts to discuss what the WHO is cooking up to force feed Americans and what can be done to stop them.
The Sovereignty Coalition Rollout Event, April 5, 2023 – #ExitTheWHO | video
New ‘Sovereignty Coalition’ Unveils Campaign to Prevent the Surrender of American Freedom Seeks US Removal from a Dangerous World Health Organization on Steroids
WASHINGTON — A remarkable, non-partisan group of patriotic, public policy-minded leaders, organizations and individuals have announced on April 56, 2023, the formation of the new “Sovereignty Coalition.” The Coalition is rooted in a shared, profound commitment to the U.S. Constitution and the God-given freedoms it guarantees. Its participants are determined to protect these foundations of our Republic by defending our national sovereignty against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
The Coalition’s immediate priority is to prevent efforts to create unaccountable global governance arrangements and authorities wholly at odds with our sovereign, constitutional form of representative, limited government. Foremost among such initiatives is the attempt by the Chinese Communist Party, Bill Gates, the pharmaceutical industry and other globalists — including the Biden administration, to empower the World Health Organization (WHO) to dictate U.S. and other nations’ public health policies.
The World Health Organization is a supranational United Nations agency that is effectively controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as evidenced, among other things, by the manner in which the WHO’s Director-General, Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, has relentlessly accomplished Beijing’s bidding. That includes advancing the CCP’s interest in bringing about a post-constitutional-America and “global governance” dominated by the Party. The CCP’s hegemonic ambitions have no place for a powerful United States of America, human freedom or personal sovereignty.
The WHO is, moreover, underwritten and malignly influenced by other hostile special interests, including Bill Gates and Big Pharma. Their efforts to expand the WHO’s supranational control align with Beijing’s…
These factors make it hardly surprising that, in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO lied about the nature, origins and effective responses to the Wuhan Virus. The “China Model” of lockdowns, masks and vaccine mandates and digital enforcement mechanisms was endorsed. And the WHO approved the use of expensive and inadequately tested gene therapies as “vaccinations” and the suppression of readily available, effective and inexpensive treatments. Thanks in part to such misconduct, the pandemic has resulted in the deaths of over a million Americans and many more elsewhere around the world, an untold number of whom perished needlessly.
Given the WHO’s appalling record, it is outrageous that the Biden administration is working to give the WHO and its Director-General more power over sovereign nations, including the United States. Yet, U.S. government officials are actively negotiating amendments to existing International Health Regulations and a new treaty governing future pandemics. These accords would effectively repose in Dr. Tedros the authority unilaterally to dictate what constitutes an actual or potential Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) and to order how affected nations must respond…
In the hands of the CCP and its friends, that authority would allow enemies of this country, foreign and domestic, to deprive Americans of their constitutional rights and other statutory protections. The WHO’s Director-General may deem, for example, gun violence, climate change, problems afflicting plants or animals and so-called “disinformation” to be causing so-called public health emergencies.
Such a surrender of national sovereignty over public health would be bad enough. In practice, however, it will translate into a loss of personal sovereignty, as well, notably as a result of WHO directives that may interfere with individual patients’ treatment by their physician… What the WHO has euphemistically dubbed its “One Health” approach would directly interfere with the patient-physician relationship by dictating the way physicians diagnose and treat individuals in their care… And through a system of “Global Health Certificates,” the World Health Organization seeks to institute a system of digital documentation, including certificates for tests, vaccinations, other prescribed preventative measures, recovery and even travel.
As a means of institutionalizing such certificates and accessing the data they contain, the WHO and its masters envision compelling the universal adoption of digital health IDs. Americans have already experienced how such “vaccine passports” can be used to enforce “jab” mandates and otherwise control individuals’ movements, activities and access to food, employment, education, finances, places of worship, etc. The Communist Party has honed such totalitarian techniques into a “Social Credit System” inside the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and is now working to export it worldwide.
Once combined with interoperable, global Central Bank Digital Currencies (also under development and backed by the Chinese Communist Party, the Biden administration, the World Economic Forum, World Bank, G-20, and other supranational globalist organizations), the WHO could enforce its medical tyranny by severing unvaccinated individuals from their bank accounts and credit cards. They would thus be trapped in a “digital gulag” unless and until they comply with whatever protocol the WHO deems advantageous to its CCP-influenced interests.
We believe that our sovereignty, constitutional Republic and personal freedoms must be protected from such a supranational threat. Therefore, the first mission of the Sovereignty Coalition is to ensure that the United States no longer underwrites, participates in or is subject to the World Health Organization and to seek, in the WHO’s stead, to create well-defined and limited arrangements for voluntarily collaborating multilaterally in the event of transnational pandemics.
Plandemics – What are they planning for your next public health emergency? | 16th webinar
Biden just signed a bill ending the COVID-19 national emergency. Can we relax and rejoice that the pandemic is over, or are we just being given a reprieve between “plandemics”?
What infrastructure was laid during the COVID-19 pandemic that could be used to destroy our national sovereignty and personal medical freedom in the case of another pandemic?
What progress has been made in the creation of mandatory digital IDs, that can be used as the basis of the China Social Credit system of surveillance and totalitarian control – under the pretext of protecting our health?
What impact would the passage of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, as well as the new pandemic treaty, have on our national sovereignty and personal medical freedom?
Is the new FED NOW system – to go live in July – an alternative to the CBDC, or a first step towards it?
Was a trap set in the last pandemic that will snap shut in the next one?
ONE HEALTH: The WHO’s Dangerous New Ideology | 17th webinar
Is the “One Health” approach advanced by the World Health Organization merely “an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems”? Or, is it a pretext for a WHO power grab to exert control over virtually every aspect of life on earth? What is the history of this ideology? Could it be used to disrupt the physician / patient relationship? Could aiming to “sustainably balance” the health of humans, animals and ecosystems be used as a justification for moving humans away from rural areas and into cities, or repurposing agricultural land? Does implementation of “One Health” require a vast surveillance system that could readily be used to rob us of our freedom? What financial interests are driving “One Health”? Is the “One Health” agenda connected to the climate change agenda? Is the “call to ecological equity” – the belief that “all life is equal, and of equal concern” – in fact an ideology, or even a religion? Does the assertion that the life of a cockroach is equal in value to that of a human constitute a belief system, and does it conflict with the traditional religious belief that God uniquely created humans in His image and likeness? Is “One Health,” ultimately, an attack on traditional faith?
A Treaty by Any Other Name: The WHO’s Latest Attack on Our Sovereignty | 18th webinar
On June 2, 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a new draft of its proposed pandemic treaty entitled, Bureau’s text of the WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response (WHO CA+).
What impact will this new draft, if adopted, have on our national sovereignty and our personal medical freedom? Will our constitutional, legislative and legal protections serve to shield us?
- Can we count on the U.S. Senate to review the two new treaties – the WHO CA+ or amendments to the International Health Regulations? Will they even be acknowledged by the Senate as treaties in need of their approval?
- Has U.S. approval of a WHO pandemic treaty – whatever they decide to call it and with the powers they demand – already been “approved” preemptively through Congress with the passage of the NDAA last year?
- Will the WHO be able to dictate how your personal physician treats you?
- Can a newly empowered WHO force vaccinations, digital IDs, and lockdowns in future pandemics, or even simply “public health emergencies of international concern” (PHEICs, pronounced “Fake”)?
- Is this pandemic treaty part of a larger plan of world domination?
- What is the role of the Chinese Communist Party in the WHO?
- Is the WHO adopting the “China Model” of tracking, surveillance, lockdowns, quarantines, mask mandates and vaccine mandates, through this treaty?
- Are the policies now being considered at the WHO already being implemented in America and elsewhere in anticipation of the coming agreement?
- How can we make our voices heard?
In fact, the “Bureau Text” – which the WHO refuses to call a “Treaty” – is a legally binding document between nation states that provides the framework and powers for a new global biotech surveillance state, complete with surveillance and censorship of virtually every aspect of life on earth under the WHO’s widely promoted “One Health” approach addressing all human, animal, plant, and environmental health issues.
The Bureau Text CA+ and its proposed “framework” — a new, unaccountable, nontransparent, bureaucracy called a “Conference of the Parties (COP)” with open-ended power to unilaterally make future changes to international health policy and to mandate compliance — working together with authoritative amendments under consideration to the existing International Health Regulations, represent an historic and unprecedented threat to nation-state sovereignty and personal freedom.
“What’s coming out of the WHO post-COVID will be the end of freedom as we know it. It will bring about transformative change to our lives with the formation of a tyrannical system of worldwide governance armed with power to mandate how nations respond to a wide array of future so-called ‘health emergencies,’” said Reggie Littlejohn, co-Chair of the Stop Vax Passports Task Force. “We’ve never seen such a threat to sovereignty, democracy, and the rule of law. To stop this power grab and preserve liberty for ourselves and generations to come will require the immediate action of millions of Americans. Indeed, the hour to act is already quite late.”
Two Sides of the Same Coin – Digital IDs and CBDCs | 19th webinar
In June, the WHO announced it is looking to adopt the European Union’s Digital COVID Vaccine Certificate (EU DCC) model for its proposed “Global Digital Health ID” as part of the new pandemic treaty. Furthermore, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is beavering away on a plan to establish a global Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) which when combined with a Global Digital ID will transform the way the international, national, state, and local economies function; enable non-representative, unaccountable, centralized, global governance; and promote the establishment of a social credit score like that oppressing citizens in Communist China.
Already in Europe, many of the proposed policies in the text are being rolled out by public health agencies and institutions. For example, the use of a “European Digital ID,” initially intended to track COVID vaccine status is rapidly expanding — and becoming mandatory — for many services like banking and transportation.
Concerned citizens and members of the public are invited to this important webinar, hosted by the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force (SVPTF) a joint project of the Committee on the Present Danger: China (CPDC) and Women’s Rights Without Frontiers (WRWF).
“Never before has humanity been so close to losing our freedom and entering a digital dark age,” said Reggie Littlejohn, co-founder of the SVPTF and the Sovereignty Coalition, founder of WRWF and member of the CPDC. “Once digital IDs and social credit scores become operational, there will be no more dissent. As soon as you try to dissent, you will be censored, your social credit score will plummet, and you may be cut off from your bank account and credit card. This would effectively paralyze and ostracize you from society. We need to act now to stop these monstrous plans before they become an Orwellian reality.”