Share this article

The Working Group for International Health Regulations (WGIHR) held their 6th meeting to work on amendments to the IHR(2005) on December 7-8 2023.

Below are some clips.

View the original source.

WGIHR Repository at Door to Freedom (backup of all public materials to date)

December 7th, 2023: Opening Session

In the clip below, the IFPMA representative provides the Pharmaceutical Industry perspective on the negotiations. There is an ongoing tension in the public side of the discussions between Pharma, which would like to protect IP, and equity.

It is ironic that Pharma is invited to speak the WGIHR and provide advice, but we the people are not.

The press release below is IFPMA’s statement about the Pandemic Treaty process, but the statements are reflected in the representative’s comments at WGIHR-6 two months later.

December 8th, 2023: Closing Session.

The Delegate from Monaco questions the Co-Chair from New Zealand as to whether they will abide by the “four month rule.”

According to Article 55 of the current IHR(2005), all proposed amendments must be circulated to all states four months prior to the consideration at the WHA.

This was also reinforced in the decision called A75(9) which led to the WGIHR beginning its work.

Similar Posts

  • Vaccine Passports and Digital IDs

    Share this article

    Vaccine passports are a tool certifying a person’s vaccination history. Based on vaccination status, a person may be prevented from traveling or accessing services. Vaccine passports could be incorporated into comprehensive digital IDs which link travel, access to services, banking, work, and social credit scores.
    A new “diagnosis” code

  • Bret Weinstein discusses the WHO Risks

    Share this article

    Bret Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist, bestselling author and co-host of the Darkhorse podcast with his wife, co-author and evolutionary biologist, Heather Heying.

  • Who Trusts the WHO? Reforming massive agencies may be a task too great.

    Share this article

    The WHO (World Health Organization) took center stage during the COVID pandemic as the global coordinator of effective response. Questions about the organization’s proper role – and competence – preceded and now survive the COVID-19 crisis. Was the WHO effective and apolitical in its response, and can it be trusted with its global medical preeminence?

  • Why The Bioweapons Research Industry Is A Danger to Society

    Share this article

    The upper class has gradually shifted to controlling the populace through economic enslavement, the fear of an ecological disaster, and the fear of a disastrous pandemic which must be stopped at any costs. An immensely profitable industry has been built around these fears…