Share this article

The word transhumanism relates to the integration of human bodies with technology. It is driven by scientific advances but directed and financed by governments, military agencies, medical institutions, Big Pharma, and multi-national corporations. Transhumanism discards medical ethics while ‘Playing God’ย with humanity.

Transhumanism and the related Technocracy (the control of society by technical experts) are the drivers of todayโ€™s eugenics  (a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population). In the past, these ideas labeled large groups of human beings as โ€œdeplorables.โ€  It is perhaps no coincidence that the Human Genome Project is housed at Cold Spring Harbor, NY — the historic center of eugenics in the US.

Transhumanists seek to cast aside the biblical idea that each human being is created in Godโ€™s image and possessed of natural rights to which we are each entitled, solely because we are human.

Transhumanists are obsessed with liberating us from our biological limitations. They predict that the merger of humans and technology will vastly increase our physical strength, our intelligence, and our life span.

However, accelerated developments in genetics, including genetic RNA and DNA vaccines, raise the possibility of genetically altering the human race.  This could produce a two-class society โ€“ a master caste and an underclass, as described in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. Transhumanists seek to vastly improve the master caste.  But what about the rest?

It may be no coincidence that Aldous Huxley’s brother Julian was the president of the British Eugenics Society, the first Director of UNESCO, and a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund.

The medical-scientific establishment has ignored the moral danger lurking behind the transhumanist agenda.  Distinguished Stanford Professor Francis Fukuyama declared that transhumanism is “the world’s most dangerous ideaโ€ because transhumanism is both authoritarian and anti-human.

An influential transhumanist, Yuval Noah Harari, a close adviser to Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, laid out a plan to replace human workers through automation and artificial intelligence. This, he stated, will create a large number of “useless people.”

The concept of โ€œuseless peopleโ€ brings to mind the Nazi concept of โ€œWorthless Eatersโ€ โ€” whom the Nazis medically murdered.

Yuval Harariโ€™s message is frightening:  will most human beings be disposable? And will the transhuman replacement for human beings be a cyborg (man melded with machine) with no imagination, no empathy, no soul and no God?

This threatens the moral foundation of a humane society – which is built upon the belief in the sanctity of the individual, our autonomy, freedom and equal rights.


Similar Posts

  • Legislative wins for States Rights

    Share this article

    Share this article States are asserting their rights to self-determination – and protecting their constituents from global governance….

  • Propaganda Toolkit #1: Ad Hominem Attacks

    Share this article

    Commonly known as โ€œname-calling,โ€ an ad hominem attack โ€œshoots the messengerโ€ in order to deflect from the substance of an issue. It generally means that a criticism of oneโ€™s character has been made, rather than a criticism of the issue. Name calling, or the ad hominem attack, is perhaps the most well-known and easy to identify…

  • The Global Rejection of CBDCs

    Share this article

    The Biden administration and the Federal Reserve are taking steps toward the potential roll-out of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In attempting to do so, they are ignoring serious concerns about consumer privacy and heavy-handed government control in the U.S. and abroad. Everywhere around the world, powerful heads of central banks and…

  • Why Can States Assert that the WHO Has No Authority Over Them?

    Share this article

    The Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution’s Bill of Rights states, โ€œThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.โ€ This means that the regulation of healthcare falls to the states.