| | | |

WHO’s Principal Legal Officer Tries To Reinterpret Rules, Pass IHR Amendments Without the Public Knowing What Is in Them

Share this article

Meet Steve Solomon — Principal Legal Officer at the WHO. After it was revealed at the fifth meeting of the WGIHR that the group would be unable to meet their deadline, Solomon stepped in to reinterpret article 55 in what appears to be an attempt to PREVENT the public from seeing the amendments before they are passed. Are these ‘negotiations’ on the IHR amendments and pandemic accord really just smokescreen and theater, designed to placate the public into thinking there is some sort of democratic process in place — as the digital biosecurity state is already being built up around us? Dr. Meryl Nass, James Corbett, and James Roguski peel back the lies and warn us why it’s time to start paying attention. Tune in!

Similar Posts

  • Louisiana Bill Against the WHO Unanimously Passes Senate

    Share this article

    Share this article SB 133 states the WEF, the UN, and the WHO shall have no jurisdiction in…

  • Mandatory Animal ID Programs

    Share this article

    The website linked below is called “Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance”. It covers the animal ID issue. You will find all the action alerts at the bottom of their site. It includes talking points and information on who to call

  • WHA Day 5

    Share this article

    Share this article The Co-Chairs provide a brief update at 6pm CET, stating they will have draft resolutions…

  • The United Nations has proposed creating an ‘Emergency Platform’ to allow it to rule during major ‘global shocks’

    Share this article

    “When the world faces a complex global shock, we must ensure that all parts of the multilateral system are accountable for contributing to a collective response. No single agency exists to gather stakeholders in the event of complex global shocks. The United Nations is the only organization that can fulfil this role.”