| | | |

WHO’s Principal Legal Officer Tries To Reinterpret Rules, Pass IHR Amendments Without the Public Knowing What Is in Them

Share this article

Meet Steve Solomon — Principal Legal Officer at the WHO. After it was revealed at the fifth meeting of the WGIHR that the group would be unable to meet their deadline, Solomon stepped in to reinterpret article 55 in what appears to be an attempt to PREVENT the public from seeing the amendments before they are passed. Are these ‘negotiations’ on the IHR amendments and pandemic accord really just smokescreen and theater, designed to placate the public into thinking there is some sort of democratic process in place — as the digital biosecurity state is already being built up around us? Dr. Meryl Nass, James Corbett, and James Roguski peel back the lies and warn us why it’s time to start paying attention. Tune in!

Similar Posts

  • Leaders Pact for the Future, Pt1

    Share this article

    The lecture uncovers the true intention behind next years UN Summit of the Future, which will result in the outcome document Leaders pact for the Future.

    The plan with the pact is to turn the recommendations from United Nations Our Common Agenda into concrete measures, and…

  • Procedural Issues with the WHO Treaties

    Share this article

    Share this article Considerations of procedural issues that likely void the ability of a nation’s diplomats to approve…

  • Who Trusts the WHO? Reforming massive agencies may be a task too great.

    Share this article

    The WHO (World Health Organization) took center stage during the COVID pandemic as the global coordinator of effective response. Questions about the organization’s proper role – and competence – preceded and now survive the COVID-19 crisis. Was the WHO effective and apolitical in its response, and can it be trusted with its global medical preeminence?