| | | |

WHO’s Principal Legal Officer Tries To Reinterpret Rules, Pass IHR Amendments Without the Public Knowing What Is in Them

Share this article

Meet Steve Solomon — Principal Legal Officer at the WHO. After it was revealed at the fifth meeting of the WGIHR that the group would be unable to meet their deadline, Solomon stepped in to reinterpret article 55 in what appears to be an attempt to PREVENT the public from seeing the amendments before they are passed. Are these ‘negotiations’ on the IHR amendments and pandemic accord really just smokescreen and theater, designed to placate the public into thinking there is some sort of democratic process in place — as the digital biosecurity state is already being built up around us? Dr. Meryl Nass, James Corbett, and James Roguski peel back the lies and warn us why it’s time to start paying attention. Tune in!

Similar Posts

  • Popular Sovereignty v. the W.H.O.

    Share this article

    With European Member of Parliament from Germany, Christine Anderson, Dr. Meryl Nass, MD, and Women’s Rights Leader Reggie Littlejohn.
    we are honored to host three exceptional leaders in the Health Freedom Movement, each making significant strides against the Globalist Health Cabal that led us into the Covid crisis.

  • Regenerative Revolution: Why Real Meat and Regenerative Agriculture Are Under Attack

    Share this article

    Share this article Robert Verkerk In this talk, Robert Verkerk, Ph.D., discusses the systematic attacks on regenerative agriculture…

  • Climate Change

    Share this article

    How do we know whether it is, on average, getting warmer or colder? We have been told the earth is dramatically heating up. On average, the world has heated up 1.1 degrees centigrade[1] (or 2 degrees Fahrenheit) since the 1880s. According to the United Nations, if the increase since 1880 goes above 1.5 degrees centigrade (or less than 1 degree Fahrenheit more,…

  • The “One Health” Agenda

    Share this article

    In today’s installment, we will examine the One Health agenda and how it threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom. 
    The term “One Health” was coined after the first SARS outbreak in the early 2000s to reflect the danger of new diseases emerging from human-animal contact. It refers to the idea of public health being not just about your health but also about animal and “planetary” health. It is framed in language designed to sound appealing and holistic.

  • Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands

    Share this article

    If you were expected to agree to an employment contract, would you not want to read it before signing? When you go to a restaurant, do you look at the menu before ordering your food or just eat whatever you happen to be given by the waiter? Or when buying a house or a car,..

  • Happy Halloween

    Share this article

    Share this article Dear Friends, Happy Halloween! Amidst all the goblins and gremlins, I wanted to share an…