Liberty Counsel reports on letter received by a constituent which includes the standard-fare misinformation.
A favorite line of politicians and policy wonks appears to be: “These documents do not mention lockdowns, closures or specific citizen surveillance systems.” It appears to be taken directly from an AP fact-check last year:
The problem is: the documents specifically describe such things – however, they use different terms.
Lockdowns: “implement quarantine or other health measures”
Closures: “refuse entry”, “implement quarantine”, “other health measures”
Citizen Surveillance Systems: “implement tracing of contacts”
Slide from Dr. Nass’s Substack.
Original post at Liberty Counsel
Jaw-Dropping Admission Confirms We’re Right
Mar 23, 2024
In response to one of our supporters, Democrat Senator Dick Durbin admitted that the WHO documents are a “treaty.” But then his written response listed three lies, which I want to unpack below.
Lie #1: “A draft treaty under consideration in the WHO does not overrule any nation’s ability to pass individual pandemic-related policies.”
This draft treaty — in combination with a list of amendments being pushed for a vote next month — clearly states that individual nations can make MORE rules or laws that are MORE restrictive than what the WHO is demanding, but they CANNOT make rules of laws that are LESS restrictive than the WHO’s legally binding “standards.”
If any nation has fewer restrictions than the WHO, the WHO will force that nation to impose the WHO’s restrictions.
Congress needs to hear from you, demanding our nation end this relationship with WHO. Make your voice heard loud and clear on Capitol Hill today.
Lie #2: “The draft treaty would be non-binding and lays out broad recommendations related to international cooperation on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.”
This draft treaty combined with the proposed amendments to the WHO’s governing documents WILL BE LEGALLY BINDING. The amendments give the WHO enormous power, and the treaty will be enforced as legally binding under international law.
Up till now, globalists have tried to hide behind the word “agreement” to avoid the word “treaty.” This same sleight of hand was done by Obama with the Paris Agreement or Paris Accord (as it is sometimes called). Yet, the Paris Agreement is actually a treaty and is listed as such on the U.N. website, with the U.S. as a signatory even though the Senate did not vote on it.
With Sen. Durbin’s admission that the WHO “agreement” is a “draft treaty,” globalists can no longer hide behind a false label. It is common knowledge that a treaty is legally binding.
That is why we must push back now before it is too late.
Lie #3: “These documents do not mention lockdowns, closures or specific citizen surveillance systems.”
The WHO documents clearly include the power to impose travel restrictions and to enforce them via digital health passports.
The draft treaty and the amendments give the WHO all power to impose lockdowns, closures, surveillance, tracking, tracing, vaccine or digital health passports, and much more.
And these documents give the WHO complete control over all medical treatments with the ability to withhold or to mandate medical treatment or vaccines, when drugs will be released to the public, and how vaccines and drugs will be approved, and the WHO would have direct control and ownership over 1 in 5 of everything manufactured that is health related.
This goes so far beyond a simple lockdown or business closure.
We are in an all-hands-on-deck moment. Our staff is working on Capitol Hill to meet with multiple legislators urging them to act now. But we can only keep fighting with your generous support today.
Mat Staver, Chairman
Liberty Counsel Action
Sources:
“Article-By-Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) Submitted in Accordance with Decision WHA75(9) (2022).” World Health Organization. Accessed February 21, 2023. Apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf.
“Zero draft of the WHO CA+ for the consideration of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body at its fourth meeting WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.” Fourth Meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating body to draft and negotiate a WHO Convention. World Health Organization, February 1, 2023. Apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf.
