|

Pesticide Companies seek Liability Protection

A pest control worker fogging in an outdoor space with smoke to eliminate pests.
Share this article

Please read Dr. Nass’s detailed post here.

On July 22, 2025 the House Interior Appropriations Committee marked up and offered amendments on the current interior appropriations bill, which includes the infamous “Section 453,” a rider that effectively gives pesticide and chemical producers a liability shield.

This shield is constructed by preventing states and the federal government from requiring updated warning labels. It rests on the legal doctrine called “failure to warn.”

The complete bill draft at the house website.

This is the complete text of Section 453 from the link above:

Near the end of the day, Representative Pingree from Maine proposed an amendment that would strike Sec. 453, effectively leaving the laws on this topic as they have stood for years. The discussion was 20 minutes long. It can be viewed on the live stream at Youtube starting at minute 3:23:04.

Similar Posts

  • Blocking Big Brother: The Fight Against Electronic Animal Tracking

    Share this article

    Share this article Judith McGeary In her talk, Judith McGeary, founder of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance,…

  • OPPOSE:  Pesticide Immunity – Sec. 10204 [Farm Bill] 

    Share this article

    This section “prohibits the right to sue for failure to warn when harmed by pesticides. In Section 10204 of the House Farm Bill, language shields (gives immunity) to the producers and users of toxic pesticides from liability lawsuits associated with the harm that their products cause…”

  • Did you know?

    Share this article

    You have to be a pet to drink raw milk in nearly 40 states!

    Dairy products made from raw (unpasteurized) milk have been a bugaboo of governments for 40 years.  FDA officers have shown up at health food stores with guns to stop the sale of raw milk!  These days, it is usually state officials that ban such sales, using the state police and demanding the products be destroyed.  In an unusual recent ruling, a Pennsylvania judge banned intrastate sales of raw milk by an Amish farmer, but admitted he had no authority to ban interstate sales. Most Americans are required to impersonate pets to obtain raw milk, as there are no bans on its sale for pet food in most states.