This audio only Interview was published by Reality Check Radio
Prominent WHO pundit, Dr Meryl Nass joins the show to tell us why recent events have been a WIN for the global public, despite the adoption of the IHRs.
Similar Posts
The United Nations has proposed creating an ‘Emergency Platform’ to allow it to rule during major ‘global shocks’
“When the world faces a complex global shock, we must ensure that all parts of the multilateral system are accountable for contributing to a collective response. No single agency exists to gather stakeholders in the event of complex global shocks. The United Nations is the only organization that can fulfil this role.”…
Global Governance + Control of the Human Genome
How are decisions made in Europe and at the WHO? Where does the power lie? Could unelected paid actors be dictating state and global health decisions for private gain? Wolfgang Wodarg, M.D., Ph.D., former Member of Parliament and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe examines the criminal business of…
22 State Attorneys General Oppose the WHO Treaties
Key reasons provided by the 22 AGs:
First Reason:
“Under proposed IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty, however, the WHO’s Director-General would achieve the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) in one or more member nations. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including climate change, immigration, gun violence, or even “emergencies” involving plants, animals, or ecosystems.”
