This audio only Interview was published by Reality Check Radio
Prominent WHO pundit, Dr Meryl Nass joins the show to tell us why recent events have been a WIN for the global public, despite the adoption of the IHRs.
This audio only Interview was published by Reality Check Radio
Prominent WHO pundit, Dr Meryl Nass joins the show to tell us why recent events have been a WIN for the global public, despite the adoption of the IHRs.
A question often asked is how nations can leave the WHO, since there is no procedure for exiting the WHO specified in the WHO’s Constitution. International law professor Francis Boyle provides the solution below. “A Withdrawal from the WHO Constitution can be accomplished by invoking the Doctrine of Fundamental Change of Circumstances under Article 62 of the Vienna Convention…
In today’s installment, we will examine the One Health agenda and how it threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom.
The term “One Health” was coined after the first SARS outbreak in the early 2000s to reflect the danger of new diseases emerging from human-animal contact. It refers to the idea of public health being not just about your health but also about animal and “planetary” health. It is framed in language designed to sound appealing and holistic.