This audio only Interview was published by Reality Check Radio
Prominent WHO pundit, Dr Meryl Nass joins the show to tell us why recent events have been a WIN for the global public, despite the adoption of the IHRs.
Similar Posts
Bravo Louisiana
In celebration of the unanimous State Senate vote in Louisiana, here are some fresh memes. Want the background?…
Take Back Your Food: Reclaiming Independence From Corporate and Government Influence
James Corbett In his talk, James Corbett emphasizes the importance of reclaiming our food choices to resist centralized…
Nature’s Solution: The Antidote to Industrial Agriculture Is Below Our Feet
JOHN KLAR John Klar — a farmer, attorney, and author — delves into the critical differences between regenerative…
The WHO hastily adopted a new set of amendments to the International Health regulations on June 1.
What does this mean, and why was this a huge win for us?
Dear Friends,
Door to Freedom was formed last July for the express purpose of stopping or defanging the WHO’s effort to take over control of public health globally:Powerful Philanthropy
With the founding of the United Nations in the immediate aftermath of WWII a powerful global framework emerged out of the rubble. While the United Nations is generally associated with “keeping the peace,” the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund soon arose to perform additional functions…
22 State Attorneys General Oppose the WHO Treaties
Key reasons provided by the 22 AGs:
First Reason:
“Under proposed IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty, however, the WHO’s Director-General would achieve the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) in one or more member nations. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including climate change, immigration, gun violence, or even “emergencies” involving plants, animals, or ecosystems.”
