The PDF below is model state level resolution reinforcing that the WHO shall have no jurisdiction in the state.
Similar Posts
Who Trusts the WHO? Reforming massive agencies may be a task too great.
The WHO (World Health Organization) took center stage during the COVID pandemic as the global coordinator of effective response. Questions about the organization’s proper role – and competence – preceded and now survive the COVID-19 crisis. Was the WHO effective and apolitical in its response, and can it be trusted with its global medical preeminence?
WHO workers commit sexual abuse in the DRC – no justice, no reparations
I attended a World Health Organisation press conference about responding to sexual abuse and exploitation by staff members in countries they are deployed. The conference was against the horrific backdrop of sex-for-work schemes and the exploitation of women during 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo…
What is One Health and Why is it a Problem?
“One Health” was conceived 20 years ago as the idea that human health and animal health are intertwined, since some diseases are transmitted from animals to humans. These diseases would perhaps be better managed with specialists in animal and human health working together. Subsequently the WHO, the US government and…
What is “nullification”?
A win for states’ rights: how do state sovereignty laws apply to the WHO and UN? In affirming…
Catherine Austin Fitts Discusses CBDCs on New Zealand’s Reality Check Radio
This article is a repost. It was published by The Solari Report. In this installment of the Reality…
Preserve National Sovereignty. Choose Freedom. Join The Great Freeset!
The WHO is currently amending its 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR), which “provide an overarching legal framework that defines countries’ rights and obligations in handling public health events and emergencies that have the potential to cross borders.” If adopted, these amendments would change…
