The PDF below is model state level resolution reinforcing that the WHO shall have no jurisdiction in the state.
Similar Posts
Dr Meryl Nass – Morally Upstanding Doctor | FreeNZ
We speak with an inspiring woman and, more unusually in today’s world, a deeply ethical and trustworthy doctor with the courage to speak out against medical tyranny and lies.
Letter to MEP Marcel de Graaff
European Medicines Agency response letter to letter of October 2, 2023 calling for suspension of Marketing Authorizations for…
OPPOSE: USDA’s Mandatory Electronic Identification (EID)
Use of Electronic Identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison (Final Rule)
A final rule by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) within the United
WCH Issues Policy Brief to Counter the WHO’s Monopolization of Global Health
WCH policy expert group urges the rejection of some of the submitted amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) and the WHO draft pandemic treaty to counter monopolization of global health. Bath, 13 April 2023 – An expert group in…
The United Nations has proposed creating an ‘Emergency Platform’ to allow it to rule during major ‘global shocks’
“When the world faces a complex global shock, we must ensure that all parts of the multilateral system are accountable for contributing to a collective response. No single agency exists to gather stakeholders in the event of complex global shocks. The United Nations is the only organization that can fulfil this role.”…
The “One Health” Agenda
In today’s installment, we will examine the One Health agenda and how it threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom.
The term “One Health” was coined after the first SARS outbreak in the early 2000s to reflect the danger of new diseases emerging from human-animal contact. It refers to the idea of public health being not just about your health but also about animal and “planetary” health. It is framed in language designed to sound appealing and holistic.
