The PDF below is model state level resolution reinforcing that the WHO shall have no jurisdiction in the state.
Similar Posts
The Enemies of Food Freedom
In every war, there is necessarily an enemy force, and the war on our food supply is no exception.
My previous article addressed the ongoing attacks on farmers across the globe. In today’s article, we will look at some of the culprits behind this agenda. For anyone who delved into the entities behind the tyrannical Covid policies, many names on the list below will seem quite familiar.CHANGE Interpretation: Control of Communicable Disease – 42 USC 264
Change statute interpretation:
Regulations to control of communicable disease – 42 USC 264
42 USC 264(a) promulgation and enforcement by the Surgeon General provides:
The Surgeon General, with the approval of the Administrator (Secretary), is authorized to make and enforce such regulations as in his judgment are necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the states or possessions,
22 State Attorneys General Oppose the WHO Treaties
Key reasons provided by the 22 AGs:
First Reason:
“Under proposed IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty, however, the WHO’s Director-General would achieve the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) in one or more member nations. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including climate change, immigration, gun violence, or even “emergencies” involving plants, animals, or ecosystems.”
Nebraska Weighs in on Cattle Emission Conversation
The environmental impacts of cattle emissions have been a contentious conversation in recent years. Some climate conscious consumers are concerned with cattle emission’s potential and impact. Researchers at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln are discovering results that may improve and optimize our management practices and ease those concerns.
