The PDF below is model state level resolution reinforcing that the WHO shall have no jurisdiction in the state.
Similar Posts
Notification Letter
A letter sent from Frihedsbevægelsens Fællesråd notifying members of government in Denmark of the grave concerns associated with…
The United Nations has proposed creating an ‘Emergency Platform’ to allow it to rule during major ‘global shocks’
“When the world faces a complex global shock, we must ensure that all parts of the multilateral system are accountable for contributing to a collective response. No single agency exists to gather stakeholders in the event of complex global shocks. The United Nations is the only organization that can fulfil this role.”…
SUPPORT: Banning EPA Encroachment – HR 7079
EPA has issued a proposed rule on effluent limitations for meat and poultry processors that looks like it could be interpreted to apply EPA sewer requirements to all meat and poultry processing plants, even small custom processors.
Why Leaving the WHO Is a Good Thing
On January 20, 2025, President Trump’s first day of his second term, the president signed an executive order…
2022: Attorneys General from 15 states Petition Against the WHO
The Petition for Rulemaking was denied by HHS. Dated July 18, 2022, fifteen state Attorneys Generals added their…
37 statements from the Pact for the Future with my deconstruction, in 13 slides
t is highly repetitive
It is replete with aspirational language about how, by following the Agenda for the SDGs or using other unspecified methods, the world’s problems will be solved. No details, of course. No examples.
However, the Pact acknowledges that essentially no progress has been made on the SDGs since they were established in 2015.
