| | | |

South Africa takes a stand against WHO’s International Health Regulations

Share this article

This article is a repost with the kind permission from CHD Africa

South Africa is leading African countries in the campaign to reject the WHO facilitated amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005, and to stop the new pandemic treaty, both of which, despite the WHO’s denial, pose clear threats to health, autonomy, and national sovereignty. These controversial instruments also create enormous debt for developing countries.

The latest development in the international campaign is a notice letter collaboratively drafted by activist and attorney Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, which was served on the WHO by a member of South Africa’s parliament Steven Swart, together with three other MP’s from the African Christian Democratic Party. The letter rejects duration related amendments to the IHR, that were adopted in 2022.

The concise but detailed notice letter strongly highlights the right to public participation and the role of parliamentary oversight in decision making, enshrined in South Africa’s constitution. It also points to procedural irregularities in WHO processes. The letter gave the WHO 7 days to produce evidence of a lawful voting process on IHR amendments in 2022. The WHO failed to provide evidence.

The letter also highlights a key fact. The IHR appears to not been properly domesticated in South African law: 

“The International Health Regulations (2005), were adopted by the 58th World Health Assembly on 23 May 2005 and entered into force on 15 June 2007.

The International Health Regulations Bill, 2013, was published for comment in the South African Government Gazette (Notice 36931) on 14 October 2013 in terms of the constitutionally required public consultation process.

This Bill sought to repeal the International Health Regulations Act 28 of 1974; to incorporate the International Health Regulations 2005 into South African domestic law in terms of section 231(4) of the Constitution in order to apply the International Health Regulations in South Africa and to provide for the matters connected therewith.

As far as we are aware, this Bill was not passed by the South African Parliament, which brings the domestication of the International Health Regulations 2005 into South African law in terms of the Constitution, and any future purported amendments to the IHR 2005 into question.”

This means that current amendments and future proposed amendments to the IHR 2005 are null and void in South African law.

Swart later made a submission in parliament during which public participation, parliament’s role, and the IHR amendments were highlighted. He mentioned another MP who is supportive of ivermectin access, National Freedom Party MP Ahmed Munzoor Sheik Emam. Emam had also committed to serving the WHO with a notice of rejection in relation to IHR 2005 amendments made in 2022.

Three other key sections unique to the South African notice letter

Resources:


Further updates in South Africa’s campaign will follow. Please follow and support CHD Africa

Similar Posts

  • WHO: The Reckless Power Grab. Health Tyranny Postponed?

    Share this article

    Despite all expectations that crucial decisions would be taken during these ten days on the revised International Health Regulations (IHR), plus the appended “Pandemic Treaty” – an absolute WHO Power Grab never heard of in recent civilization – no such decisions have been taken, yet…

  • Food Corruption: Fake Meat, GMOs, and Beyond

    Share this article

    Most readers are likely familiar with GMOs and how genetically modified organisms have been shown to cause significant health problems, how they have ruined the lives of independent farmers who are sued after their land is involuntarily contaminated by Monsanto seeds, and how glyphosate use has risen thanks to Roundup Ready GMO crops. Unfortunately, corruption of the food supply is advancing far beyond this.

  • Iran Rejected the Amendments

    Share this article

    Share this article Iran, as well as New Zealand, rejected the May 2022 International Health Regulations (IHR) amendments…

  • The Control of Food

    Share this article

    Our grandparents and great grandparents produced much of their own food in their gardens or on their farms. Food choices in stores were limited, with little frozen food available and fewer fresh and canned foods for sale. Our grandparents and great grandparents produced much of their own food in their gardens or on their farms…

  • Launch of a New Doorway to Freedom

    Share this article

    Nass was one of the doctors who, during the COVID pandemic, offered patients early treatment in Maine and Maryland. As a result, her medical license was suspended and the medical board forced her to undergo psychiatric evaluation. Apparently, in the present era, doctors who think saving lives is more important than following unscientific medical advice…