| | | | | | | |

SUPPORT:  Right to Grow/Raise Food [Tennessee] State bill, also in Texas and passed in Maine

Share this article

Bill to follow and support:    

Tennessee Senate Bill 1761 (SB 1761)

SB 1761 was introduced in the 2024 Tennessee legislative session and was has been referred to summer study by the Senate Subcommittee on State and Local Government. The bill protects the right of Tennessee residents to grow and raise their own food providing: 

… a county shall not adopt or enforce a regulation that prohibits any of the following activities on a single-family residential lot:
(1) The growing of fruits and vegetables; or 
(2) The raising or keeping of:      
(A) Six (6) or fewer chickens; or      
(B) Six (6) or fewer rabbits.  

For growing fruits and vegetables, counties and municipalities still have the power to impose reasonable regulations on that activity, including requiring that the growing area be maintained in good condition if visible from the street faced by the lot or an adjoining lot; and requiring the trimming or removal of a tree  as necessary for the maintenance of a utility easement. 

The county or municipality may also impose reasonable regulations under the bill on the growing and raising of chickens and rabbits to control odor, noise, safety, or sanitary conditions, including allowing more chickens and rabbits than the minimum number specified by SB 1761, prohibiting the keeping of a rooster, and requirements on fencing or shelter. 

With the accelerating decline of food for sale in the conventional food system, it’s becoming increasingly important to protect the right of individuals to grow their own food. Zoning regulations can be a big impediment to growing and consuming an individual’s foods of choice. Texas had a similar bill, House Bill 1686, in the 2021 session that would have not only prohibited not only counties and municipalities from banning the growing of food on a single-family residential lot but Home Owners Associations as well. The optimal system in terms of self-sufficiency, and food security would be to have people growing and raising their own food not be subject to zoning laws, only to laws on public and private nuisance or other laws protecting their neighbors’ enjoyment of their own property.  

—— 

Tenn. SB 1761 – https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/Billinfo/default.aspx? BillNumber=SB1761&ga=113

Texas HB 1686 – https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=87R&Bill=HB1686

Similar Posts

  • The Social Credit System is Already Here

    Share this article

    Another shot was fired last week signaling the arrival of a Social Credit System in the US. JP Morgan’s Chase Bank abruptly closed several accounts of Dr Mercola, his businesses, his employees, and employees’ family members. Chase claimed it took the actions “because of unexpected activity.”…

  • Stop Vax Passports webinar

    Share this article

    This Post contains all 19 Webinars hosted & organized by Stop Vax Passports. The Topics are #1 Vaccine Passports, #2 Military Vaccine Mandates, #3 Vaccine Mandates for Children, #4 Natrual Immunity Matter, #5 Covid Mandates, #6 Covid Mandates, #7 Digital Gulag, #8 Stop The Sellout Of US Sovereignty To The WHO, #9 The Digital Gulag At Davos and The WHO, #10 Covid Jabs, #11 Covid Injections and Women, #12 Covid Coercion and Fraud…

  • Oklahoma House Passes Legislation Against the WHO

    Share this article

    Share this article EDITED: 4/26/24 SB426 passed House April 24 2024 with floor amendments. Now goes to Senate….

  • Bayer has paid over $10 Billion for glyphosate litigation

    Share this article

    Now it wants a liability shield to end the lawsuits, and it is determined to get it, by hook or by crook.  Can we stop it? In 2018, Bayer acquired Monsanto, despite Monsanto starting to lose legal cases in which Roundup was alleged to have caused cancer. It must have looked like a clever deal to Bayer, with the litigation reducing Monsanto’s price. But Bayer did not foresee that the Roundup litigation could get out of hand.