Similar Posts
Reforming the WHO isn’t possible; it’s doing what it was meant to do
The image above is not about the World Health Organization’s (WHO) mishandling of the coronavirus. It’s from an article published in 2015, after the WHO botched their response to the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. You can see how far we’ve come since then. “Reform” of the WHO has a formula:
37 statements from the Pact for the Future with my deconstruction, in 13 slides
t is highly repetitive
It is replete with aspirational language about how, by following the Agenda for the SDGs or using other unspecified methods, the world’s problems will be solved. No details, of course. No examples.
However, the Pact acknowledges that essentially no progress has been made on the SDGs since they were established in 2015.
22 State Attorneys General Oppose the WHO Treaties
Key reasons provided by the 22 AGs:
First Reason:
“Under proposed IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty, however, the WHO’s Director-General would achieve the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) in one or more member nations. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including climate change, immigration, gun violence, or even “emergencies” involving plants, animals, or ecosystems.”
