This is a repost and originally posted by The Epoch Times
Attorney at law with his own law firm in Zurich Switzerland. He has practiced for over 25 years in business and in tax law. In the fall of 2020, Philipp decided to dedicate his professional experience to re-establishing an evidence- and constitution-based approach to resolve the COVID-19-crisis.
Similar Posts
An Update on the Pandemic Preparedness Agenda – This affects YOU
Western governments along with the World Health Organization (WHO) are in the midst of creating a massive, militarized health program for the world’s population. It is said to be about preparing and responding to future pandemics. Even though the world only had 4 pandemics in the past 100 years…
Global Takeover Advances to Final Stages
In this September 1, 2023, Highwire interview [1], Dr. Meryl Nass, a biowarfare and epidemics expert, exposes the threat posed by the World Health Organization’s
pandemic treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs),
which add to and further strengthen the WHO’s powers under the treaty. The WHO’s One Health agenda is also part of…
South Africa takes a stand against WHO’s International Health Regulations
South Africa is leading African countries in the campaign to reject the WHO facilitated amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005, and to stop the new pandemic treaty, both of which, despite the WHO’s denial, pose clear threats to health, autonomy, and national sovereignty…
Centralizing Public Health Control With Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Catherine Austin Fitts and Carolyn Betts talk all things pandemic propaganda on this week’s ‘Financial Rebellion’ episode. Find out how, even before the COVID-19 debacle, emergency powers may have been used and abused by vaccine manufacturers and those in power…
The WHO pandemic treaty and IHR revisions: Will We Compound the COVID tragedy?
by Michael T. Clark, PhD and Meryl Nass, MD
This is an important paper for decision-makers and diplomats: Door to Freedom’s White Paper analyzing the negative implications of the policy decisions made during the COVID pandemic, and how the proposed Pandemic Agreement and IHR amendments will compound these mistakes.
