Attorney at law with his own law firm in Zurich Switzerland. He has practiced for over 25 years in business and in tax law. In the fall of 2020, Philipp decided to dedicate his professional experience to re-establishing an evidence- and constitution-based approach to resolve the COVID-19-crisis.
Similar Posts
The Myth of Pandemic Preparedness
Meryl Nass with James Corbett and David Bell on CHD.tv
Climate Revival Meeting in Davos
The theme of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos 2023 was “Cooperation in a Fragmented World”. In many ways, this year appears as an in-between-year, even though certain central components of the continuing agenda were introduced…
Today Dutch Parliament Votes to Instruct the Government to Demand a Delay in both WHO votes–and if no delay, to vote against the proposals
“After hearing the deliberations, noting that both the Working Group International Health Regulations (WGIHR) and the International Negotiating Body (INB) are authorized to deliver the final legal formulation..
Letter to MEPs, the European Commission, the European Council, and the WHO
Questions are asked of the letter’s recipients: 1) What is the legal basis that allows the EU to…
Reforming the WHO isn’t possible; it’s doing what it was meant to do
The image above is not about the World Health Organization’s (WHO) mishandling of the coronavirus. It’s from an article published in 2015, after the WHO botched their response to the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. You can see how far we’ve come since then. “Reform” of the WHO has a formula:
What are the International Health Regulations?
While the current IHRs have been considered recommendations and not orders, the members of the World Health Assembly (the W.H.O. member states) decided to amend the existing IHR in March 2022.[4] Currently only drafts, and not the final IHR proposal are currently available, the drafts…
