Share this article

The World Health Organization (WHO) is an agency formed under the auspices of the United Nations (UN) in 1948, shortly after the UN itself was formed following World War 2.  It is considered a specialized agency of the UN.

Unlike other specialized UN agencies, the WHO has its own constitution, and can make treaties.

The WHO is composed of 194 member nations and 2 observer (associate) nations that are not members.  It is headquartered in Geneva, and there are six regional WHO offices around the world.

While the WHO receives payments (assessments) from its member nations, the assessments only cover less than 15% of the WHO’s total expenses.  The remaining funds to support its biennial budget must come from voluntary contributions.

https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/fact-sheet/the-u-s-government-and-the-world-health-organization/

These contributions come from member states, from philanthropic foundations and from corporations.  Often the contributions come with strings attached, and so the WHO must carry out programs its lenders specify.

https://open.who.int/2020-21/budget-and-financing/gpw-overview

Broken down by contributions that specify particular work to be done versus funding from assessments from members, it is apparent that specified contributions are 6 times greater than assessments, limiting the WHO’s freedom to choose its own programs.

https://open.who.int/2020-21/contributors/contributor

The World Health Assembly (WHA) is the gathering of the WHO’s member states, and it holds an annual meeting each May in Geneva.  There is also a 34 member [1] Executive Board.  This Board nominates the Director-General for a 5 year term, who is then appointed by the WHA.

When President Trump initiated actions to leave the WHO in 2020 and withheld the US’s yearly assessment, Bill Gates stepped in to fill the financial gap, as did another charity he founded, Gavi. President Biden restored the funding, kept the US in the WHO and increased the US’s voluntary contributions to the WHO.

How well did the WHO do during the COVID-19 pandemic?  Even the WHO’s own panel criticized [2] its response to COVID-19.  However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, nations had the right to follow the WHO’s advice or ignore it. 

If the Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulation amendments are passed by the World Health Assembly in their current form in May 2024, nations will lose their ability to make their own public health decisions. When the Director-General declares a public health emergency of international concern, they will be legally bound to obey the WHO’s orders.


[1] https://apps.who.int/gb/gov/en/composition-of-the-board_en.html

[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/18/world/europe/virus-WHO-report-failures.html

Resources

WHO Constitution (BD 49th)

https://apps.who.int/gb/gov/ (under resources)

WHO Basic Documents (BD)

https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/ (to find the 3rd edition of IHR 2005)

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246107/9789241580496-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Similar Posts

  • WHO workers commit sexual abuse in the DRC – no justice, no reparations

    Share this article

    I attended a World Health Organisation press conference about responding to sexual abuse and exploitation by staff members in countries they are deployed. The conference was against the horrific backdrop of sex-for-work schemes and the exploitation of women during 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo…

  • Social Credit Score: Fiction or Reality?

    Share this article

    The concept of a social credit system is based on a government-run credit rating system that assigns score and trustworthiness to its citizens and businesses, which could be blacklisted or whitelisted based on the score itself. China’s social credit system started as a regional trial in 2009 and was expanded into a national pilot with eight credit scoring firms in 2014…

  • Did you know?

    Share this article

    You have to be a pet to drink raw milk in nearly 40 states!

    Dairy products made from raw (unpasteurized) milk have been a bugaboo of governments for 40 years.  FDA officers have shown up at health food stores with guns to stop the sale of raw milk!  These days, it is usually state officials that ban such sales, using the state police and demanding the products be destroyed.  In an unusual recent ruling, a Pennsylvania judge banned intrastate sales of raw milk by an Amish farmer, but admitted he had no authority to ban interstate sales. Most Americans are required to impersonate pets to obtain raw milk, as there are no bans on its sale for pet food in most states.