Why a Sovereign State Bank Is Good for Tennessee

Share this article

This article is a repost. It was published by The Solari Report.

I. Executive Summary

This document presents to state legislators in Tennessee the case for setting up a State Bank of Tennessee (SBT). SBT would act as a second-tier bank, interposed between the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (FRBA) and the Tennessee State Government (TSG) on the one hand, and local banks (community banks, credit unions, savings banks, locally-headquartered commercial banks) operating in Tennessee on the other. The goal of SBT is to ensure that the State of Tennessee can better act in the interests of its citizens, better fulfill its constitutional duties, and provide for a resilient and strong economy and financial system. SBT will not compete with smaller local banks for loan and deposit market shares, but will act to support them in a number of ways, including loan participations and purchases, while mutually benefiting from expanded liquidity in state-level short-term money markets.

Small and medium-sized enterprises account for the vast majority of jobs in Tennessee (as elsewhere) and research has demonstrated that their prosperity and capacity for job creation, innovation, and expansion depends to a significant extent on the availability and capacity of small local banks. Small firms and small banks depend on each other in a symbiotic relationship.

The establishment of SBT would help support small and medium-sized enterprises in Tennessee to gain access to funding and deposit markets, significantly strengthening the economy of Tennessee and also increasing tax revenues without any tax increases.

Related Reading:

PDF Copy

Special Solari Report: A Sovereign State Bank and Bullion Depository for Tennessee with Senator Frank Niceley

From The Moneychanger: Senator Frank Niceley – Restoring Freedom in Tennessee

Special Solari Report: Free in Tennessee: Kicking Tyranny to the Curb

Similar Posts

  • Who Trusts the WHO? Reforming massive agencies may be a task too great.

    Share this article

    The WHO (World Health Organization) took center stage during the COVID pandemic as the global coordinator of effective response. Questions about the organization’s proper role – and competence – preceded and now survive the COVID-19 crisis. Was the WHO effective and apolitical in its response, and can it be trusted with its global medical preeminence?

  • Open Letter to the WHO Calling for Rule of LAw

    Share this article

    Share this article Open Letter calling for rule of law, equity and an appropriate review process in development…

  • “Not Now” on the Surrender of Our Sovereignty to the WHO

    Share this article

    At the end of May, President Biden intends to join other nations in supplanting our Constitution and the liberties it guarantees with something called “global governance.” Their plan, which has been stealthily negotiated for several years at the World Health Organization (WHO)…

  • The Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum

    Share this article

    The World Economic Forum or WEF was founded by Klaus Schwab in Geneva, Switzerland in 1971. It has developed into a futurist mix of private club and think tank where politicians, captains of industry and various thought leaders can meet, discuss policy and be seen at its yearly conclaves in Davos or China, and other…