Legal Review and Analysis of proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations – Norway
Morten Walløe Tvedt
Similar Posts
22 State Attorneys General Oppose the WHO Treaties
Key reasons provided by the 22 AGs:
First Reason:
“Under proposed IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty, however, the WHO’s Director-General would achieve the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) in one or more member nations. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including climate change, immigration, gun violence, or even “emergencies” involving plants, animals, or ecosystems.”
Global Takeover Advances to Final Stages
In this September 1, 2023, Highwire interview [1], Dr. Meryl Nass, a biowarfare and epidemics expert, exposes the threat posed by the World Health Organization’s
pandemic treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs),
which add to and further strengthen the WHO’s powers under the treaty. The WHO’s One Health agenda is also part of…
