Legal Review and Analysis of proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations – Norway
Morten Walløe Tvedt
Similar Posts
WHA 77 is over: What happened?
The Pandemic Treaty was postponed. Amendments to the International Health Regulations were adopted, and remain non-binding. The draft…
Critically important compilation of screenshots from the WHO’s proposed International Health Regulations and Pandemic Treaty. I decode them. Can’t argue about them.
They take away your right to medicines of your choice, freedom of speech, privacy. Can impose border closures,…
Open Letters from Citizens about the WHO Treaties
Open Letters from Argentina, France, and India
WHO workers commit sexual abuse in the DRC – no justice, no reparations
I attended a World Health Organisation press conference about responding to sexual abuse and exploitation by staff members in countries they are deployed. The conference was against the horrific backdrop of sex-for-work schemes and the exploitation of women during 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo…
Louisiana Bill Against the WHO Unanimously Passes Senate
SB 133 states the WEF, the UN, and the WHO shall have no jurisdiction in Louisiana. This bill…
Oklahoma becomes 2nd US state to pass a law that denies jurisdiction to the WHO, UN and WEF
No edicts coming directly or indirectly from WHO, UN or WEF will be enforced in Oklahoma How beautiful…
