Legal Review and Analysis of proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations – Norway
Morten Walløe Tvedt
Similar Posts
An Update on the Pandemic Preparedness Agenda – This affects YOU
Western governments along with the World Health Organization (WHO) are in the midst of creating a massive, militarized health program for the world’s population. It is said to be about preparing and responding to future pandemics. Even though the world only had 4 pandemics in the past 100 years…
W.H.O. Do You Think You Are? – Exposing the Globalists’ W.H.O. Scheme | May 19th
On Friday, 19 May 2023, the UK Column and Children’s Health Defense Europe hosted a joint symposium on the World Health Organisation. The exposé was moderated by Catherine Austin Fitts with outstanding line up of experts with wide variety of background and expertise. Catherine is the president of Solari, Inc., publisher of the…
22 State Attorneys General Oppose the WHO Treaties
Key reasons provided by the 22 AGs:
First Reason:
“Under proposed IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty, however, the WHO’s Director-General would achieve the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) in one or more member nations. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including climate change, immigration, gun violence, or even “emergencies” involving plants, animals, or ecosystems.”
