| | | | |

Slovakia announces it will not sign the existing versions of the treaty and IHR amendments. Tedros begs Slovakia to not block “consensus”

The bogus consensus the WHO often claims, but rarely receives, is something that needs to be exploded.

Why were the Netherlands, New Zealand, Iran so quiet about issuing reservations or rejections of the amendments in 2022? Were they bribed or exhorted or threatened to keep it quiet because the WHO was claiming consensus for the 2022 approval?

We are very grateful to Slovakia for making its position known. We beg Slovakia to come to the meeting and to vote NO. Help other nations come forward by voting NO, rather than doing what the WHO wants, which is to not appear for the vote, and by so doing Slovakia would not block the WHO’s false claim of consensus.

Similar Posts

  • Legal Review and Analysis

    Legal Review and Analysis of proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations – Norway Morten…

  • Why Can States Assert that the WHO Has No Authority Over Them?

    The Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution’s Bill of Rights states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” This means that the regulation of healthcare falls to the states.

  • Opposition From Argentina, Belarus and Iran at the 77th Worl health assembly

    Argentina Argentina expresses their concerns on the process for the amendments on the IHR and tells the WHA…