| | |

No, solar panels are not farmland

Share this article

Government counts solar panel arrays as agricultural lands

This article is a repost with the kind permission from the author

Concerned that rapid development threatened critical agricultural resources, Indiana’s Legislature in 2023 commissioned a study to determine the status of the state’s farmland. Noting that most agricultural land loss neighbored cities and suburban areas, the study concluded that Indiana lost 345,682 acres of farmland between 2010 and 2022.

(Some beefalo calves and a white face grazing among solar panels in Randolph Vermont.)

As Bill Gates and China notoriously gobble up price-inflating fertile lands, another pressure is devouring prime farmland.  Vast solar panel arrays are disappearing farmland across the nation despite howls of protest.  Perhaps that is why the Indiana study included solar panel acreage as farmland in its bizarre farmland accounting.

Solar panels are not a nitrogen-fixing cover crop, nor do they till into the soil annually like plants.  Cows and sheep can dine on the grass beneath them but can’t eat solar panels any better than humans can.  The quite understandable question arises: why did Indiana count solar farms’ land use as agricultural?

The omission is an admission: solar panels repurpose soil from food to energy production, even as grocery bills skyrocket.  Americans are told cows are evil and must be replaced with synthetic lab meat, yet cows eat blades of grass that are God’s solar panels: they are naturally renewable, sans Chinese coal and factories.  A trillion dollars in Biden renewables subsidies has contributed to a diversion of farmland to build factories that churn out forever chemicals and water pollution.

How much U.S. land has already been polluted with solar panels, which emit toxic chemicals in their manufacture and pose serious environmental problems upon disposal, is unclear.  The lack of studies of just how much land is being lost to this folly may be purposeful, as the Indiana study appears to be:

Agriculture officials relied on data from the state Department of Local Government Finance [DLGF] and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to create its findings. The report stated that the DLGF includes uses like renewable energy in its counting for farmland.

How much productive farmland will be vacated of cows, to be populated with solar panels?  It is not just rural landscapes that are sacrificed, but people’s reliance on the soil microbiome for food, which must be transported ever farther distances as local farmland diminishes.  This threatens food security and is hardly beneficial for the environment.

The climate barons’ techno-mystical proclamations reveal their plans for America’s future.  An earlier estimate of the land needed to supply the nation with solar energy was 22,000 square miles, or more than 14 million acres.  However, advances in efficiency have reduced that to “merely” 10,000 square miles, or 6.4 million acres.

Plans to save the world by mass manufacturing gadgets instead of food are even more ambitious.  To provide enough solar energy for the global human population would require an unfathomable amount of manufacturing production and an equally vast acreage:

This would require an estimated 92.7 billion solar panels, enough to completely cover America’s 11 smallest states (South Carolina, West Virginia, Maryland, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Vermont, Delaware, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Hawaii and Rhode Island) plus another 4,000 square miles!

The United States has lost more than 66 million acres of farmland due to commercial development and suburban sprawl.  Population growth (even without the artificial boost of illegal immigration) will continue to squeeze agricultural lands into irreversible development without the assistance of federal subsidies for inedible solar panels.

It is simple to see why renewable energy profiteers would conceal the scale of agricultural land loss attributable to their policies, just as they hide the true environmental damages inflicted by the coal-fired plants and mining operations necessary to produce them and the non-renewable landfill destiny of their planned obsolescence.  (They may pollute even more than E.V. cars!)

America may have room for 10 million acres of solar panels, but characterizing them as agricultural land is deceptive folly.  Planning for converting more farmland to landfill space must begin soon so there will be sufficient dumps to house inefficient solar panels upon retirement. 

Perhaps the landfills will be counted as farmland…

(Previously published at American Thinker.)

Similar Posts

  • Who Trusts the WHO? Reforming massive agencies may be a task too great.

    Share this article

    The WHO (World Health Organization) took center stage during the COVID pandemic as the global coordinator of effective response. Questions about the organization’s proper role – and competence – preceded and now survive the COVID-19 crisis. Was the WHO effective and apolitical in its response, and can it be trusted with its global medical preeminence?

  • A Growing Crisis: How Glyphosate Is Making Climate Change Worse

    Share this article

    Share this article Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D. Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., presents her talk, “Glyphosate, the Ecosystem, and Climate Change,”…

  • Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands

    Share this article

    If you were expected to agree to an employment contract, would you not want to read it before signing? When you go to a restaurant, do you look at the menu before ordering your food or just eat whatever you happen to be given by the waiter? Or when buying a house or a car,..

  • How to Protect Your Food and Medical Freedoms

    Share this article

    In my previous six articles series, we looked at the global war on farmers, the organizations pushing for the Great Food Reset, the tactics used to foist these changes on the public, the projects underway to remove your access to healthy, farm-fresh foods, the mRNA, RNA, and DNA gene therapies entering our food supply, and how the One Health agenda threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom. 
    So what can we do about it? 
    The good news is that there are many things we can do.