The comparison: IHR amendments as proposed in February 2023 and adopted on June 1, 2024.
Here are the proposed and adopted articles 1,2,3 and 6. I think the onus should be on those…
Here are the proposed and adopted articles 1,2,3 and 6. I think the onus should be on those…
No edicts coming directly or indirectly from WHO, UN or WEF will be enforced in Oklahoma How beautiful…
a) impenetrable last-minute legalese, b) a history of making reservations that enable the US to dodge compliance, and…
Why were the Netherlands, New Zealand, Iran so quiet about issuing reservations or rejections of the amendments in 2022? Were they bribed or exhorted or threatened to keep it quiet because the WHO was claiming consensus for the 2022 approval?
The negotiations have been controlled by globalists, not nations, from day one. How many other countries are entirely…
Important to share this, and I am happy to speak or zoom with any Parliamantarians or Congress members with questions
What can lawmakers do to stop the Pandemic Agreement (Treaty)
The UK is holding a long and expensive inquiry into how its various governments handled the covid epidemic and into the response of the NHS. There are many questions to answer and lessons to be learned.
People said surveillance and censorship: control of misinformation and disinformation had been removed. Not so. They are just…
I start out with the International Health Regulations (IHR) amendments. We don’t have an official version later than February 2023, so we don’t know exactly what will be voted on next month, but this is what the public has been shown.
“After hearing the deliberations, noting that both the Working Group International Health Regulations (WGIHR) and the International Negotiating Body (INB) are authorized to deliver the final legal formulation..
End of content
End of content