|

Censorship and Propaganda

Share this article

Dear Friends,

 

Door to Freedom believes that in order for the globalist power grab to succeed, information must continue to be controlled, globally. Therefore, efforts to maintain tight control of mainstream and social media for the purposes of censorship and propaganda are increasing.

To this end, the UN has pushed out the extraordinary claim that free speech is hate speech, and that it leads to genocide. The terms "misinformation" and "disinformation" were apparently insufficient to retain a stranglehold on speech. So-called "hate speech," however, is being pushed out in European countries as something that can be criminalized. Ursula von der Leyen has said (in other words) that information control is her #1 priority. Furthermore, instead of teaching children about the central importance of free speech to a democracy, the UN plans to teach our children how to redefine free speech as hate speech.

https://www.un.org/en/hate-speech

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/advising-and-mobilizing/Action_plan_on_hate_speech_EN.pdf

We know of no such obligation in any international treaties, particularly since the definition of these terms has been used very loosely by the UN and in this statement.   In fact, the UN has no definition of hate speech:

https://www.un.org/en/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/what-is-hate-speech

"However, to date there is no universal definition of hate speech under international human rights law. The concept is still under discussion, especially in relation to freedom of opinion and expression, non-discrimination and equality."

Perhaps according to plan, the US Supreme Court issued its ruling on the seminal censorship case of this century, Murthy v Missouri on June 26, 2024. In a narrow ruling that failed to deal with the merits of the case, the justices determined there was not enough evidence of direct harm to plaintiffs to grant them the standing to proceed further.  This deals a considerable blow to free speech in the US, apparently giving carte blanche to the federal government to direct censorship of American citizens by private companies.

However, Alex Berenson has a similar case, and he has direct evidence in Slack chats belonging to Twitter employees that the White House directly interfered with him, including this statement, referring to a conversation with the White House: "had one really tough question about why Alex Berenson hasn't been kicked off from the platform…"
It would thus appear that standing for Alex Berenson will not be in question.

RFK Jr. and Children's Health Defense have a similar (censorship/ First Amendment) case pending in the 5th Circuit, and they believe they can overcome the issue of standing raised by the Supreme Court also.  

Door to Freedom will be closely following and working to overturn this attack on free speech, and the manner in which courts are interpreting the law and the Constitution. The Alliance for Natural Health's Rob Verkerk and I discussed this issue on CHD-TV on June 26.  ANH has an anti-censorship campaign that we will join.

The mission of Door to Freedom is to overturn the program of centralization of power and resources (also known as the Great Reset) being conducted by global elites, assisted by the United Nations organization, its subsidiary the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, other private entities and many national leaders.

To this end we will continue to attack all censorship efforts at national and international levels.

Door to Freedom also believes that the ability to roll out pandemics, roll out rapidly produced vaccines, and control the food supply are the secondary goals of the globalists, and we will be working closely on these issues as well going forward.

Sincerely,

Meryl Nass, MD for Door to Freedom 

Similar Posts

  • How to “Opt-out” from the Big Tech Social Credit System

    Share this article

    Update 10-15-23: The first version of this article was well-received. Thanks to everyone who took the time to send me feedback. Based on this, I updated the content and expanded the article with the latest developments and more options that people should know about. The state of tech is an ever-changing …

  • Just Released: The Newest Version of the Pandemic Treaty Draft

    Share this article

    Share this article The latest version of the Pandemic Treaty draft was released this week.  The “Advanced Unedited…

  • Technocracy: The Digital Panopticon Of The World Economic Forum

    Share this article

    A week before World Economic Forum’s 2020 meeting, the report Unlocking Technology for the Global Goals was released by WEF’s Global Future Council Working Group on 4IR for Global Public Goods. The report, written in collaboration with the audit and consulting firm PwC, reviews how…

  • An Update on the Pandemic Preparedness Agenda – This affects YOU

    Share this article

    Western governments along with the World Health Organization (WHO) are in the midst of creating a massive, militarized health program for the world’s population. It is said to be about preparing and responding to future pandemics. Even though the world only had 4 pandemics in the past 100 years…

  • Their Strategy in the War on Food

    Share this article

    Perhaps you remember Event 201, the pandemic simulation run in late 2019 that served as a dress rehearsal for the 2020 Covid response. Such simulations have been used in the War on Food as well. Take, for example, the Food Chain Reaction Game, a 2015 wargame that simulated the time period from 2020 to 2030.

  • 37 statements from the Pact for the Future with my deconstruction, in 13 slides

    Share this article

    t is highly repetitive

    It is replete with aspirational language about how, by following the Agenda for the SDGs or using other unspecified methods, the world’s problems will be solved. No details, of course. No examples.

    However, the Pact acknowledges that essentially no progress has been made on the SDGs since they were established in 2015.