Dr. Meryl Nass returns from 27 days of international advocacy to catch up with James Corbett on evidence the WHO’s house of cards is collapsing worldwide. It’s no wonder that countries like Slovakia, Estonia, Romania, New Zealand, South Africa + more are rejecting the IHR amendments amid the WHO’s December deadline, “It’s the perfect system of control .. This story is so horrendous, all it needs is a few sparks in the right place, and the fire will come.” After all — would YOU give a blank check to an organization with no accountability?

Good Morning CHD is a daily news show by Children's Health Defense TV bringing you the latest daily news ☀️
Similar Posts
Exiting the World Health Organization
A question often asked is how nations can leave the WHO, since there is no procedure for exiting the WHO specified in the WHO’s Constitution. International law professor Francis Boyle provides the solution below. “A Withdrawal from the WHO Constitution can be accomplished by invoking the Doctrine of Fundamental Change of Circumstances under Article 62 of the Vienna Convention…
Deny, Deflect, Defend: The Censors’ Strategy on Display
Despite the uproar surrounding the case, Judge Terry Doughty’s order in Missouri v. Biden was straightforward. It prohibited government actors from colluding with social media companies to censor “content containing protected free speech.” In other words, the defendants – including the White House, the CDC, and the Department of Justice – must obey the Constitution…
Who Funds the WHO? A Closer Look Behind the World Health Organization’s Budget
“Voluntary contributions, specified and thematic, make up about 80% of the budget,” denoted former WHO medical officer and scientist Dr. @bell00david.
“And this is important because specified contributions are contributions that are provided for a specific project in a specific place. They are very directive,” he explained.