| |

“Not Now” on the Surrender of Our Sovereignty to the WHO

Share this article

Action by Sovereignty Coalition

At the end of May, President Biden intends to join other nations in supplanting our Constitution and the liberties it guarantees with something called “global governance.” Their plan, which has been stealthily negotiated for several years at the World Health Organization (WHO), would permit no informed debate – let alone require the approval of the American people with regard to turning over to Tedros Ghebreyesus, the WHO’s Director-General, the exclusive responsibility to decide when we have a “public health emergency of international concern” and what we must do about it.

We have already had a taste of what such a surrender of our sovereignty would entail. Even though Dr. Ghebreyesus is not a medical doctor, he was allowed to prescribe what the United States and every other nation ought to do in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. And his advice – which was to mask up, lock-down and take mandatory jabs with experimental and inadequately tested “vaccines” – proved disastrous. By some estimates, a million Americans who contracted COVID needlessly died because of Ghebreyesus’ malfeasance.

Clearly, it would be insane to give this Maoist foreign bureaucrat, who was selected for his job by the Chinese Communist Party, the power to dictate public health policy in our country. But, that is what will happen if two treaties now being finalized are put to a vote by the World Health Assembly in just a few weeks’ time. We need your help to prevent that from happening under present circumstances and to preserve our sovereignty and your medical freedom.

Join us in telling President Biden: “Not Now.” The vote on the two treaties scheduled for the May 27 to June 2 World Health Assembly must be delayed. Final drafts should have been circulated on January 27, yet the final texts are still being negotiated. You don’t want him binding us to a “global governance” arrangement without an informed national debate about these two, deeply problematic treaties and absent the U.S. Senate advising and consenting to them.

Spread the word!

Similar Posts

  • What’s Wrong with Health Equity?

    Share this article

    The call for health equity has become a rallying cry for public health – health for all and the ability for all people to reach their full health potential. In order to achieve this, public health aims to eliminate health disparities, essentially differences in health outcomes, for disadvantaged people in the population. For example, particular racial or ethnic groups may have…

  • SUPPORT:  Interstate Milk Freedom Act – HR 8374 

    Share this article

    Notwithstanding the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264), and any regulations or other guidance thereunder, a Federal department, agency, or court may not take any action (including any administrative, civil, criminal or other action) that would prohibit, interfere with, regulate, or otherwise restrict the interstate traffic of milk, or a milk product, that is unpasteurized and packaged for direct human consumption, if— 

  • Bret Weinstein discusses the WHO Risks

    Share this article

    Bret Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist, bestselling author and co-host of the Darkhorse podcast with his wife, co-author and evolutionary biologist, Heather Heying.