|

Recently circulated: new draft of amendments to the IHR

Share this article

The 300+ amendments proposed last year have been whittled down to something readable, yet still problematic.

The 8th meeting of the Working Group on the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) is happening this week. Their task has been to harmonize the 300+ proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005. These were first released in February 2023 to shock and dismay in the international community. They included items such as a strike through in “non-binding” and “with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons.

More than a year went by before an unofficial draft was leaked in February 2024.

Today, a working draft, dated April 17 2024, is being circulated. It appears to be a real working draft and is hosted on the WHO website.

Primary Concerns & understanding how the document works:

Rather than compare the April 17 2024 draft to prior draft amendments, let’s compare it to the standing IHR 2005 – current international law. In the US, the IHR 2005 has been further reinforced into domestic legislation through the NDAA 2023.

Binding versus Non-binding:

The IHR 2005, and this new draft, maintain the definition of recommendations being “non-binding.”  However, a substantive change is the new definition of the National IHR Authority. This entity coordinates implementation of the IHR within the individual country.

Article 4 shows how this becomes binding (see the “shall” words? Go read the NDAA 2023.)

Human Rights

Human rights has been paired with equity.

Potential vs Actual Health Emergencies

The new language for potential pandemics is covered by “pandemic emergencies”, below:

Article 12 allows “pandemic emergencies” (i.e. potential pandemics) to be determined by the Director General.

And Article 13 provides that the WHO shall coordinate the pandemic response, whether in a Pandemic or “pandemic emergency”:

Censorship of misinformation; Surveillance

These items, problematic and illegal in some western countries, have been moved to Annex 1. Each state party “shall” develop these capacities both at the Intermediate and National Level.

Digital ID

Article 35 has been updated planning for digital health documents. So has Annex 6.


Similar Posts

  • How Farmers Become Serfs

    Share this article

    The state of farming in modern-day America is far removed from the way it was just decades ago. In this “Good Morning CHD” episode, Breeauna Sagdal and Meryl Nass, M.D. have a timely conversation on various factors that determine the success of agriculture, today. They discuss loans and pricing, inspection and approval processes, industry monopolization, volatility in the supply chain, food shortages and more. Tune in!

  • What happened this week at the UN?

    Share this article

    The WHO Can’t Tell the States What to Do

    One of our partner organizations, Stand For Health Freedom is developing a petition to the White House, Congress, and the Office of Global Affairs in the US Department of Health and Human Services. (This Office manages the US-WHO interface.). The petition will request that the US add a ‘reservation’ to the proposed International Health Regulations Amendments.

  • CBDCs: Ultimate Tool of Oppression

    Share this article

    If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – for ever,’ said O’Brien, the grand inquisitor of the totalitarian regime in Orwell’s futuristic novel 1984.
    Alternatively, you could imagine a sandal. Last month I visited Sutton Hoo, the famous Anglo-Saxon burial site of a king and his ship in Suffolk…

  • Did you know?

    Share this article

    You have to be a pet to drink raw milk in nearly 40 states!

    Dairy products made from raw (unpasteurized) milk have been a bugaboo of governments for 40 years.  FDA officers have shown up at health food stores with guns to stop the sale of raw milk!  These days, it is usually state officials that ban such sales, using the state police and demanding the products be destroyed.  In an unusual recent ruling, a Pennsylvania judge banned intrastate sales of raw milk by an Amish farmer, but admitted he had no authority to ban interstate sales. Most Americans are required to impersonate pets to obtain raw milk, as there are no bans on its sale for pet food in most states.