| |

REPPARE: The Rational Report on the Pandemic Preparedness Agenda

Share this article

Re-Evaluating the Pandemic Preparedness And REsponse agenda (REPPARE)

Visit the REPPARE homepage at the University of Leeds

From the REPPARE site:

Dealing with pandemics and other health emergencies is an important aspect of public health. Interventions must be weighed against potential direct and indirect benefits, the probability that an intervention can be realized, and the direct and indirect costs that will be accrued. Such costs and benefits must include social and mental impacts, assessed within an ethical framework that respects human rights. Human populations are diverse in terms of risk, whilst priorities are influenced by cultural, religious and social factors, as well as competing priorities arising from other diseases. This requires careful policy development and an implementation approach that responds to public need and is consistent with the will of the community.

Read More

Download and Read the REPPARE Reports and Policy Briefs:

Similar Posts

  • World Economic Forum’s Techno-Totalitarian Roadmap

    Share this article

    The Corona crisis is the trigger for a global coup d’état of monumental dimensions. It is the beginning of a new era, with a new international economic order that risks completely destroying human freedoms. Tyrants have now taken over to forcibly steer us into a “climate smart” and “healthy” world…

  • COVID-19: The Biodefense Mafia

    Share this article

    Transcript:
    [01] – My name is Spartacus, and I’ve had enough.
    [02] – In the 1960s, Jose Delgado, a Spanish neuroscientist, performed experiments where he implanted electrodes in the brains of bulls. He would then stand in front of charging bulls and bring them to a halt with a remote control that activated the power supply for these electrodes.
    [03] – In 1970, he published a book entitled Physical Control…

  • Exiting the World Health Organization

    Share this article

    A question often asked is how nations can leave the WHO, since there is no procedure for exiting the WHO specified in the WHO’s Constitution. International law professor Francis Boyle provides the solution below. “A Withdrawal from the WHO Constitution can be accomplished by invoking the Doctrine of Fundamental Change of Circumstances under Article 62 of the Vienna Convention…

  • 37 statements from the Pact for the Future with my deconstruction, in 13 slides

    Share this article

    t is highly repetitive

    It is replete with aspirational language about how, by following the Agenda for the SDGs or using other unspecified methods, the world’s problems will be solved. No details, of course. No examples.

    However, the Pact acknowledges that essentially no progress has been made on the SDGs since they were established in 2015.