Finally!! Truth about the bogus Biosecurity Agenda in the mainstream press. Tremendously important.
This article is a repost. It was originally published in The Wall Street Journal
This article is a repost. It was originally published in The Wall Street Journal
Founder, Door to Freedom
Dr. Nass is a physician and researcher who proved the world's largest anthrax epidemic was due to biological warfare. She revealed the dangers of the anthrax vaccine. Her license was suspended for prescribing COVID medications and 'misinformation.'
Disentangling COVID disinformation since 2020:
https://merylnass.substack.com/
Read More
t is highly repetitive
It is replete with aspirational language about how, by following the Agenda for the SDGs or using other unspecified methods, the world’s problems will be solved. No details, of course. No examples.
However, the Pact acknowledges that essentially no progress has been made on the SDGs since they were established in 2015.
In this September 1, 2023, Highwire interview [1], Dr. Meryl Nass, a biowarfare and epidemics expert, exposes the threat posed by the World Health Organization’s
pandemic treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs),
which add to and further strengthen the WHO’s powers under the treaty. The WHO’s One Health agenda is also part of…
At Solari, our focus is on working to protect financial transaction freedom and expose the central bankers’ dangerous agenda of complete financial transaction control. Digital IDs—which, in combination with other digital systems, can “be used to monitor our whereabouts, limit our freedom of movement and control our access to money, goods and services”—are a linchpin of the control agenda, and one that the bankers and their technocratic allies are eager to bring to fruition
The WHO (World Health Organization) took center stage during the COVID pandemic as the global coordinator of effective response. Questions about the organization’s proper role – and competence – preceded and now survive the COVID-19 crisis. Was the WHO effective and apolitical in its response, and can it be trusted with its global medical preeminence?