| |

“Why Scientists Love Chasing Bats. The threat to humans from animal viruses is small. The financial incentive to pretend otherwise is large”/ WSJ

Share this article

Finally!! Truth about the bogus Biosecurity Agenda in the mainstream press. Tremendously important.

This article is a repost. It was originally published in The Wall Street Journal

Similar Posts

  • My talk on the COVID plandemic, the Bogus and Expensive BioSecurity Agenda, Tricks Globalists Play to Get Experimental Vaccines into Arms, and How to Move Forward and End This Mess

    Share this article

    The globalists rely on lies, tricks and misdirection to accomplish their goals, but people hate being tricked and fooled.
    Not only was Fauci aware of at least 6 areas on the COVID genome that looked engineered on February 1, 2020—but he had Ralph Baric secretly listening in to the call who probably already knew what the others might identify as engineered sequences and was helping to plan the cover-up. Ralph Baric’s hidden presence suggests that he and Fauci already knew the virus was engineered, and may have been trying to get a bead on what strategies they would need to use to hide it. This is also a hint that Baric had something to do with developing the COVID virus, or knew who did.

  • Opposition From Argentina, Belarus and Iran at the 77th Worl health assembly

    Share this article

    Share this article Argentina Argentina expresses their concerns on the process for the amendments on the IHR and…

  • WHO workers commit sexual abuse in the DRC – no justice, no reparations

    Share this article

    I attended a World Health Organisation press conference about responding to sexual abuse and exploitation by staff members in countries they are deployed. The conference was against the horrific backdrop of sex-for-work schemes and the exploitation of women during 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo…

  • The “One Health” Agenda

    Share this article

    In today’s installment, we will examine the One Health agenda and how it threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom. 
    The term “One Health” was coined after the first SARS outbreak in the early 2000s to reflect the danger of new diseases emerging from human-animal contact. It refers to the idea of public health being not just about your health but also about animal and “planetary” health. It is framed in language designed to sound appealing and holistic.

  • How to Protect Your Food and Medical Freedoms

    Share this article

    In my previous six articles series, we looked at the global war on farmers, the organizations pushing for the Great Food Reset, the tactics used to foist these changes on the public, the projects underway to remove your access to healthy, farm-fresh foods, the mRNA, RNA, and DNA gene therapies entering our food supply, and how the One Health agenda threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom. 
    So what can we do about it? 
    The good news is that there are many things we can do.