Share this article

HR 8374 – https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8374

Proposed Constitutional Amendment on Right to Food  

Earlier this year Representative Thomas Massie proposed an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that states: 

The right of the people to grow food and to purchase food from the source of their choice shall not be infringed and Congress shall make no law regulating the production and distribution of food products which do not move across state lines.

To date, Rep. Massie has not filed a resolution for the proposed amendment; he’s considering whether to make an edit to the bill. 

The amendment would effectively repeal the disastrous Supreme Court ruling in Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) as that case applies to intrastate food production and distribution. In Wickard, the Supreme Court effectively held that feeding your own farm animals with wheat you had grown was subject to marketing quotas Congress had set under the 1938 Agricultural Adjustment Act, setting a precedent that has helped give the federal government extensive jurisdiction over intrastate commerce. 

Passage of Massie’s proposed amendment could lead to significant decentralization of food production and distribution as well as deregulation of intrastate food commerce.  

While the amendment is a long shot to pass, it could have the effect of galvanizing efforts to pass similar constitutional amendments at the state level. Tennessee had a right to food amendment, similar to the one Maine voters passed in 2021, that was one vote shy passing out of committee in 2024. In other states looking to pass right to food amendments; the Massie amendment could give them a boost. Passage of the amendment would mean the repeal of the 1967 Wholesome Meat Act (WMA) as it applies to intrastate commerce; this act has been largely responsible for the transformation of the meat industry into an oligopoly where four firms control 80-85% of the market. Passage would lead to the Poultry Products Inspection Act no longer applying to intrastate commerce; four firms control around 60% of the market in that industry. Likewise, the Egg Products Inspection Act would no longer apply to intrastate commerce.  The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) would no longer apply to those producing and selling within a state, meaning those producers would no longer be subject to the onerous FSMA regulations, such as the “Preventative Controls”, “Produce Safety”, and “Additional Traceability” rules. 

Similar Posts

  • The Dangers of Artificial General Intelligence

    Share this article

    OpenAI’s ChatGPT is the most rapidly adopted tech platform in history, acquiring more than 1 million users in the first five days. Less than two months after its public release, it had more than 100 million users
    ChatGPT uses machine learning to generate human-like responses in everyday language to…

  • WHA 77: Spotlight on Pandemic Treaty and IHR amendments

    Share this article

    Share this article Day 2 of WHA 77 Starting at 14:30 Geneva time, Committee A of the World…

  • Central Banks Want CBDCs | Prof Richard Werner | BIG PICTURE

    Share this article

    As part of the upcoming film CBDC: The End of Money, I interviewed renowned economist and professor Richard Werner.

    Professor Werner is the father of the monetary policy concept of quantitative easing, the author of the best-selling book Princes of the Yen: Japan’s Central Bankers and the Transformation of the Economy, and the writer of an important paper on the actual operations of banks.

  • How politics can destroy your soul – confessions of a former Tory candidate

    Share this article

    Enoch Powell’s (quoted) words ring truer every day: ‘Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad’. Watching the Andrew Bridgen saga, it seems we have reached Biblical levels of sin. One man out of 650 in parliament is now able to speak the truth and he is shunned for it. Most have no idea how this kind of thing can happen…