| |

New WHO-Regime

ByPhilipp Kruse, LL.M
Avatar photo

Attorney at law with his own law firm in Zurich Switzerland. He has practiced for over 25 years in business and in tax law. In the fall of 2020, Philipp decided to dedicate his professional experience to re-establishing an evidence- and constitution-based approach to resolve the COVID-19-crisis.

Similar Posts

  • Procedural Issues with the WHO Treaties

    ByMeryl Nass M.D.

    Considerations of procedural issues that likely void the ability of a nation’s diplomats to approve the WHO’s 2…

  • Launch of a New Doorway to Freedom

    ByDr. Joseph Mercola

    Nass was one of the doctors who, during the COVID pandemic, offered patients early treatment in Maine and Maryland. As a result, her medical license was suspended and the medical board forced her to undergo psychiatric evaluation. Apparently, in the present era, doctors who think saving lives is more important than following unscientific medical advice…

  • Happy Halloween

    ByMeryl Nass M.D.

    Dear Friends, Happy Halloween! Amidst all the goblins and gremlins, I wanted to share an important overview of…

  • 22 State Attorneys General Oppose the WHO Treaties

    ByDoor to Freedom

    Key reasons provided by the 22 AGs:

    First Reason:

    “Under proposed IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty, however, the WHO’s Director-General would achieve the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) in one or more member nations. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including climate change, immigration, gun violence, or even “emergencies” involving plants, animals, or ecosystems.”