| | | | | |

UK ‘sleepwalking’ into ‘lockdown first’ pandemic agreement, ministers warned

Share this article

This post is an excerpt of an article published in The Telegraph

Suella Braverman, a former attorney general, tells The Telegraph she has ‘serious concerns’ about proposed treaty.

Britain is “sleepwalking” into a pandemic agreement that risks bouncing it into a “lockdown first” precedent, ministers have been warned.

There is “unease” among MPs about the World Health Organisation’s pandemic treaty, due to be ratified later this month.

MPs are urging the Government not to rush into signing the agreement, which they say has serious implications for the UK’s sovereignty and ability to decide national policies in a future global health crisis.

Critics warn that signing up to the treaty could put member states under pressure to follow the UN agency’s instructions when responding to future pandemics, which could include measures such as lockdowns, vaccine passports, border closures and quarantine.

Source: webarchive

Similar Posts

  • Transhumanism

    Share this article

    The word transhumanism relates to the integration of human bodies with technology. It is driven by scientific advances but directed and financed by governments, military agencies, medical institutions, Big Pharma, and multi-national corporations. Transhumanism discarded medical ethics while ‘Playing God’ with humanity. Transhumanism and the…

  • Legal Review and Analysis

    Share this article

    Share this article Legal Review and Analysis of proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations…

  • What has New Zealand’s new government committed to with Regard to the WHO?

    Share this article

    Share this article Now it is our job to help the government issue the appropriate documents that will…

  • Who Trusts the WHO? Reforming massive agencies may be a task too great.

    Share this article

    The WHO (World Health Organization) took center stage during the COVID pandemic as the global coordinator of effective response. Questions about the organization’s proper role – and competence – preceded and now survive the COVID-19 crisis. Was the WHO effective and apolitical in its response, and can it be trusted with its global medical preeminence?