| | | | |

Slovakia announces it will not sign the existing versions of the treaty and IHR amendments. Tedros begs Slovakia to not block “consensus”

Share this article

The bogus consensus the WHO often claims, but rarely receives, is something that needs to be exploded.

Why were the Netherlands, New Zealand, Iran so quiet about issuing reservations or rejections of the amendments in 2022? Were they bribed or exhorted or threatened to keep it quiet because the WHO was claiming consensus for the 2022 approval?

We are very grateful to Slovakia for making its position known. We beg Slovakia to come to the meeting and to vote NO. Help other nations come forward by voting NO, rather than doing what the WHO wants, which is to not appear for the vote, and by so doing Slovakia would not block the WHO’s false claim of consensus.

Similar Posts

  • read this Excellent Analysis by Libby Klein

    Share this article

    Share this article What decision-making role will the Australian parliament have in relation to the proposed IHR amendments?…

  • Where is the Video?

    Share this article

    Share this article The WHA 77 schedule for June 1st shows that Committee A was supposed to receive…

  • The “One Health” Agenda

    Share this article

    In today’s installment, we will examine the One Health agenda and how it threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom. 
    The term “One Health” was coined after the first SARS outbreak in the early 2000s to reflect the danger of new diseases emerging from human-animal contact. It refers to the idea of public health being not just about your health but also about animal and “planetary” health. It is framed in language designed to sound appealing and holistic.

  • The WHO Is a Real and Present Danger

    Share this article

    Our governments intend to transfer decisions over our health, families, and societal freedoms to the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO), whenever he or she declares it necessary. The success of this transfer of power depends on public ignorance of its implications, and of the nature of the WHO itself and its recent pandemic policy reversals…