| | | |

SUPPORT: Custom Meat Pilot Program – Sec. 12114 [Farm Bill] 

Share this article

SUPPORT: H.R. 8467 – The Farm, Food and National Security Act of 2024, Section 12114. Pilot Program to Support Custom Slaughter Establishments

Current law prohibits the sale of custom slaughtered and/or processed meat, only allowing its use “in the household of…[the] owner, by him and members of his household, and his non-paying guests and employees….” (21 USC 623) 

The pilot program in Section 12114 of the House Farm Bill would start the process of changing that. Section 12114 gives states the option of administering their own pilot program; for the first two years of the five-year pilot program, a state program could approve up to five facilities to participate. The pilot program would allow the intrastate sale of custom meat and meat food products from the custom facility that did the processing (the facility could be custom only, not a mix of custom and a federal- or state-inspected facility) or by the owner whose animal was processed.  

If there is no finding that any of the approved custom facilities has produced adulterated food, after two years the state department of agriculture can approve another five facilities for the remainder of the program. The pilot program sunsets on September 30, 2029. The U.S. Secretary of Agriculture may approve up to 20 facilities to participate in the pilot program that are located in those states are not administering their own. The laws governing the pilot program are mostly similar to what the custom facilities have to be in compliance with now. 

Once the pilot program sunsets the next step is for Congress to adopt some form of custom sales of meat as permanent law beginning the process of rolling back the disastrous Wholesome Meat Act of 1967, the legislation which created federal jurisdiction over intrastate meat commerce. Lack of slaughterhouse access and the expense of getting animals processed at federally or state inspected facilities are problems allowing the sale of custom meat would improve. 

Similar Posts

  • Danish Health Minister Response to FBF

    Share this article

    Share this article Brief letter in response to 22 page report hand delivered in January 2024. View the…

  • Are There Vaccines in our Food Supply?

    Share this article

    Today we will delve into the contentious issue of vaccines in the food supply.
    Accurate information on this topic is not easy to find. The USDA and drug developers aren’t required to release any information on veterinary drugs in the development pipeline, so independent detectives are left searching through peer-reviewed papers, university publications, USDA contracts, grant notifications, company white papers, and university websites to learn what is on the horizon.

  • How Did the Corruption of Public Health Happen?

    Share this article

    International public health is a mess. Once seen generally as a public good, the focus of the World Health Organization (WHO) now more closely resembles a scheme for extracting private profit from the public purse. Wealthy corporations drive a ‘public-private partnership’ agenda…

  • Who Trusts the WHO? Reforming massive agencies may be a task too great.

    Share this article

    The WHO (World Health Organization) took center stage during the COVID pandemic as the global coordinator of effective response. Questions about the organization’s proper role – and competence – preceded and now survive the COVID-19 crisis. Was the WHO effective and apolitical in its response, and can it be trusted with its global medical preeminence?

  • Vaccine Safety Heads to Congress

    Share this article

    Coronavirus Subcommittee studies adverse reaction reporting systems.
    The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic convened a hearing on Feb. 15 titled “Assessing America’s Vaccine Safety Systems, Part 1.”