| | | | | | | |

SUPPORT:  Interstate Milk Freedom Act – HR 8374 

Share this article

H.R. 8374 provides, in part:  

Notwithstanding the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264), and any regulations or other guidance thereunder, a Federal department, agency, or court may not take any action (including any administrative, civil, criminal or other action) that would prohibit, interfere with, regulate, or otherwise restrict the interstate traffic of milk, or a milk product, that is unpasteurized and packaged for direct human consumption, if— 

. . . 

(2) the milk or milk product’s State of origin allows (by law, regulation, or policy) unpasteurized milk or unpasteurized milk products to be distributed for direct human consumption by any means, including any form of retail sale, direct farm to consumer distribution, or cowshare; 

… 

(4) the milk or milk product is moved from the State of origin with the intent to transport the milk or milk product to another State which allows the distribution of unpasteurized milk or unpasteurized milk products for direct human consumption, as described in paragraph (2), irrespective of whether the applicable laws of such other State are identical to the laws of the State of origin. 

The bill legalizes the shipment across state lines of raw milk or raw milk products from one state where its sale or distribution is legal to another state where its sale or distribution is legal. The bill is timely in that it can be part of the pushback against FDA/ CDC’s anti-raw milk bird flu campaign—a campaign that has only helped to increase the demand for raw milk since the onset of bird flu.  

The bill provides that FDA cannot regulate any raw milk or milk products crossing state lines as long as the specific product is not adulterated and is in compliance with applicable state laws on production, packaging, labeling, and transportation. 

Representative Thomas Massie first introduced this bill in 2015; HR 8374 amounts to a partial repeal of the interstate ban on raw dairy and is a better option than a total repeal of the ban. The latter would trigger FDA jurisdiction over raw dairy in interstate commerce; FDA’s history of harassment of raw cheese makers (chronicled in Catherine Donnelly’s book, The War on Artisan Cheese) serves as a warning. As it is, FDA could have jurisdiction over all raw milk producers/distributors benefiting from HR 8374 to ensure compliance with federal labeling laws.  

The bill will definitely help consumers in states where there is a shortage of supply and in states where the law is restrictive on the distribution of raw milk.  21 CFR 117 – https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-117

Similar Posts

  • In Defense of Livestock

    Share this article

    Share this article Climate “warriors” and animal rights activists are out in far-left field on cows and livestock…

  • Milking Cows for Methane

    Share this article

    Share this article This is a repost with permission from the author. Novel scientific processes are being developed…

  • Why Are Intelligent People So Easily Tricked?

    Share this article

    ‘As a rule, I have found that the greater brain a man has, and the better educated, the easier it has been to mystify him.’ So said master illusionist Harry Houdini. He said it during his spat with Sherlock Holmes’ creator Sir Arthur Conan Doyle over the latter’s belief in seances and fairies. Despite being a literary genius, Conan Doyle nevertheless had some foolish ideas…

  • Bayer has paid over $10 Billion for glyphosate litigation

    Share this article

    Now it wants a liability shield to end the lawsuits, and it is determined to get it, by hook or by crook.  Can we stop it? In 2018, Bayer acquired Monsanto, despite Monsanto starting to lose legal cases in which Roundup was alleged to have caused cancer. It must have looked like a clever deal to Bayer, with the litigation reducing Monsanto’s price. But Bayer did not foresee that the Roundup litigation could get out of hand.

  • Launch of a New Doorway to Freedom

    Share this article

    Nass was one of the doctors who, during the COVID pandemic, offered patients early treatment in Maine and Maryland. As a result, her medical license was suspended and the medical board forced her to undergo psychiatric evaluation. Apparently, in the present era, doctors who think saving lives is more important than following unscientific medical advice…