|

What is “Gain of Function’ research?

Share this article

‘Gain of Function’ (GOF) research uses benign-sounding terminology to confuse people who are unfamiliar with the subject.  It used to be called ‘biodefense,’ ‘biological warfare’ and ‘germ warfare’ research in past decades.

The term refers to making existing microorganisms (viruses, fungi and bacteria) more dangerous, by giving them one or more new functions.

Those added functions might be:

  1. the ability to spread more efficiently from person to person (increased infectivity or contagiousness)
  2. The ability to spread by aerosol transmission when the microorganism was unable to spread that way previously
  3. the ability to be more virulent or deadly

Some people think this type of research was banned by an international treaty (The Biological Weapons Convention of 1972) but as long as the research is said to be done for defensive purposes, and the quantities of microorganisms produced are small, it is not banned.

In 2014 over 200 scientists called for a halt to gain of function research.[1]  The federal government did halt gain of function research, but only for avian influenza and SARS-like viruses, and it left loopholes.  The ban only applied to federally funded research.  It did not apply to other families of viruses.  Waivers could be issued by NIH. 

In 2017 the ban was removed, but GOF research was supposed to be vetted by an NIH “Potential Pandemic Pathogens” committee.  However, the committee was never asked to review SARS-like research, which simply continued.  In 2022, scientists again called for better guidance on gain of function research [2] and restrictions may be coming [3] in the future.

The Lancet Infectious Diseases journal wrote, “Statistics on the number of breaches in the 1500 or so high containment laboratories in the USA are hard to come by.” [4] However, the CDC and USDA issue yearly reports [5] on the accidents in labs that do research on potential pandemic pathogens.  There are about 200 such accidents yearly in the United States that get reported to the program.

The CDC and USDA jointly manage the “Federal Select Agent Program” (FSAP) that keeps track of research on microorganisms that might cause pandemics in humans, livestock or food crops.  In 2021, the FSAP program reported 22 matters to the FBI for investigation involving loss of material, loss of a mouse and the presence of ‘select agents’ outside their registered location.  In 2021, the select agent program received 185 reports of losses or releases.[6]


[1] https://www.cambridgeworkinggroup.org/

[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01209-w

[3] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00257-0

[4] https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2818%2930006-9/fulltext

[5] https://www.selectagents.gov/resources/publications/docs/FSAP_Annual_Report_2021_508.pdf

[6] https://www.selectagents.gov/resources/publications/docs/FSAP_Annual_Report_2021_508.pdf

Similar Posts

  • Bitter harvest — 30 years of broken GMO promises

    Share this article

    Whatever happened to GM Golden Rice? And wasn’t GM salmon supposed to revolutionise aquaculture? Three decades after the first GMO crops were planted, Save Our Seeds, in collaboration with GMWatch, with contributions from Beyond GM, explores the fate of eight GMO promises once presented as game-changers. The conclusion: bold claims, dismal delivery.

  • Food Corruption: Fake Meat, GMOs, and Beyond

    Share this article

    Most readers are likely familiar with GMOs and how genetically modified organisms have been shown to cause significant health problems, how they have ruined the lives of independent farmers who are sued after their land is involuntarily contaminated by Monsanto seeds, and how glyphosate use has risen thanks to Roundup Ready GMO crops. Unfortunately, corruption of the food supply is advancing far beyond this.

  • Know Your Cow: Empowering Consumers To Take Control of Their Meat Supply

    Share this article

    Share this article Breeauna Sagdal Breeauna Sagdal of The Beef Initiative highlights how centralized control over the U.S….

  • Propaganda Toolkit #1: Ad Hominem Attacks

    Share this article

    Commonly known as “name-calling,” an ad hominem attack “shoots the messenger” in order to deflect from the substance of an issue. It generally means that a criticism of one’s character has been made, rather than a criticism of the issue. Name calling, or the ad hominem attack, is perhaps the most well-known and easy to identify…