| | | | |

Letter sent to australian Prime Minister – signed by 14 members of Parliament

ByDoor to Freedom
Share this article
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The following 3 page letter was sent to the Australian Prime Minister on the 14th. May, 2024. It was signed by 14 members of the Australian Parliament.

“The IHR Amendments and the WHO Pandemic Treaty will transform the WHO from an advisory organisation to a supranational health authority dictating how governments must respond to emergencies which the WHO itself declares.
For the reasons above, that outcome is well outside the jurisdictional competence of the WHO and the WHA, and in any event, is unacceptable to many Australians. We call on the Government to reject the IHR Amendments and the WHO Pandemic Treaty at WHA77

Avatar photo

Similar Posts

  • 22 State Attorneys General Oppose the WHO Treaties

    ByDoor to Freedom
    Share this article
    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    Key reasons provided by the 22 AGs:

    First Reason:

    “Under proposed IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty, however, the WHO’s Director-General would achieve the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) in one or more member nations. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including climate change, immigration, gun violence, or even “emergencies” involving plants, animals, or ecosystems.”

  • The Enemies of Food Freedom

    ByTracy Thurman
    Share this article
    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    In every war, there is necessarily an enemy force, and the war on our food supply is no exception. 
    My previous article addressed the ongoing attacks on farmers across the globe. In today’s article, we will look at some of the culprits behind this agenda. For anyone who delved into the entities behind the tyrannical Covid policies, many names on the list below will seem quite familiar.

  • Exiting the World Health Organization

    ByFrancis Boyle, PhD
    Share this article
    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    A question often asked is how nations can leave the WHO, since there is no procedure for exiting the WHO specified in the WHO’s Constitution. International law professor Francis Boyle provides the solution below. “A Withdrawal from the WHO Constitution can be accomplished by invoking the Doctrine of Fundamental Change of Circumstances under Article 62 of the Vienna Convention…

  • Did you know?

    BySolari Report
    Share this article
    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    You have to be a pet to drink raw milk in nearly 40 states!

    Dairy products made from raw (unpasteurized) milk have been a bugaboo of governments for 40 years.  FDA officers have shown up at health food stores with guns to stop the sale of raw milk!  These days, it is usually state officials that ban such sales, using the state police and demanding the products be destroyed.  In an unusual recent ruling, a Pennsylvania judge banned intrastate sales of raw milk by an Amish farmer, but admitted he had no authority to ban interstate sales. Most Americans are required to impersonate pets to obtain raw milk, as there are no bans on its sale for pet food in most states.