Decoded: One Health wants to lower the status of humans.

Share this article

What did the Lancet say last January about One Health? That non-human animals are of equal concern as humans.

Reposted from Meryl Nass MD Substack.

Link to the original article at the Lancet

“The reality is that One Health will be delivered in countries, not by concordats between multilateral organisations, but by taking a fundamentally different approach to the natural world, one in which we are as concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and the environment as we are about humans. In its truest sense, One Health is a call for ecological, not merely health, equity.”

It is in the last paragraph below. Please reassure yourself that this is really what the WHO, Biden administration, EU, World Bank and all the other One Health scammers are planning for us. Hey, animals need equity too.

Here is what the Treaty says about One Health on page 9. It is a word salad, difficult to decode, but clearly they are very serious about this ONE HEALTH thing, devoting an entire Article (of 36 articles total) to it. Bsically they do not want us to know what it means.

Similar Posts

  • Notice of Liability Letters delivered to WHO Executives

    Share this article

    Share this article Swiss Lawyer Phillipp Kruse, on behalf of World Council for Health, hand delivers four notices…

  • Global Takeover Advances to Final Stages

    Share this article

    In this September 1, 2023, Highwire interview [1], Dr. Meryl Nass, a biowarfare and epidemics expert, exposes the threat posed by the World Health Organization’s
    pandemic treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs),
    which add to and further strengthen the WHO’s powers under the treaty. The WHO’s One Health agenda is also part of…