Decoded: One Health wants to lower the status of humans.

Share this article

What did the Lancet say last January about One Health? That non-human animals are of equal concern as humans.

Reposted from Meryl Nass MD Substack.

Link to the original article at the Lancet

“The reality is that One Health will be delivered in countries, not by concordats between multilateral organisations, but by taking a fundamentally different approach to the natural world, one in which we are as concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and the environment as we are about humans. In its truest sense, One Health is a call for ecological, not merely health, equity.”

It is in the last paragraph below. Please reassure yourself that this is really what the WHO, Biden administration, EU, World Bank and all the other One Health scammers are planning for us. Hey, animals need equity too.

Here is what the Treaty says about One Health on page 9. It is a word salad, difficult to decode, but clearly they are very serious about this ONE HEALTH thing, devoting an entire Article (of 36 articles total) to it. Bsically they do not want us to know what it means.

Similar Posts

  • Treaties & International Agreements

    Share this article

    Share this article 90% of International Agreements do not go through 2/3rd Senate Ratification, yet have the effect…

  • Why The Bioweapons Research Industry Is A Danger to Society

    Share this article

    The upper class has gradually shifted to controlling the populace through economic enslavement, the fear of an ecological disaster, and the fear of a disastrous pandemic which must be stopped at any costs. An immensely profitable industry has been built around these fears…

  • Bitter harvest — 30 years of broken GMO promises

    Share this article

    Whatever happened to GM Golden Rice? And wasn’t GM salmon supposed to revolutionise aquaculture? Three decades after the first GMO crops were planted, Save Our Seeds, in collaboration with GMWatch, with contributions from Beyond GM, explores the fate of eight GMO promises once presented as game-changers. The conclusion: bold claims, dismal delivery.