| | | |

SUPPORT: Custom Meat Pilot Program – Sec. 12114 [Farm Bill] 

Share this article

SUPPORT: H.R. 8467 – The Farm, Food and National Security Act of 2024, Section 12114. Pilot Program to Support Custom Slaughter Establishments

Current law prohibits the sale of custom slaughtered and/or processed meat, only allowing its use “in the household of…[the] owner, by him and members of his household, and his non-paying guests and employees….” (21 USC 623) 

The pilot program in Section 12114 of the House Farm Bill would start the process of changing that. Section 12114 gives states the option of administering their own pilot program; for the first two years of the five-year pilot program, a state program could approve up to five facilities to participate. The pilot program would allow the intrastate sale of custom meat and meat food products from the custom facility that did the processing (the facility could be custom only, not a mix of custom and a federal- or state-inspected facility) or by the owner whose animal was processed.  

If there is no finding that any of the approved custom facilities has produced adulterated food, after two years the state department of agriculture can approve another five facilities for the remainder of the program. The pilot program sunsets on September 30, 2029. The U.S. Secretary of Agriculture may approve up to 20 facilities to participate in the pilot program that are located in those states are not administering their own. The laws governing the pilot program are mostly similar to what the custom facilities have to be in compliance with now. 

Once the pilot program sunsets the next step is for Congress to adopt some form of custom sales of meat as permanent law beginning the process of rolling back the disastrous Wholesome Meat Act of 1967, the legislation which created federal jurisdiction over intrastate meat commerce. Lack of slaughterhouse access and the expense of getting animals processed at federally or state inspected facilities are problems allowing the sale of custom meat would improve. 

Similar Posts

  • SUPPORT:  Interstate Milk Freedom Act – HR 8374 

    Share this article

    Notwithstanding the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264), and any regulations or other guidance thereunder, a Federal department, agency, or court may not take any action (including any administrative, civil, criminal or other action) that would prohibit, interfere with, regulate, or otherwise restrict the interstate traffic of milk, or a milk product, that is unpasteurized and packaged for direct human consumption, if— 

  • Model Legislation

    Share this article

    Share this article The PDF below is model state level resolution reinforcing that the WHO shall have no…

  • History Repeating: The War on the Kulaks

    Share this article

    If you’ve read We’re All Dutch Farmers Now and We’re All Sri Lankan Farmers Now, then you’ll know all about the concerted war on farming that is taking place right now, not just in Holland or Sri Lanka but in Ireland and Argentina and Canada and Spain and seemingly every other country around the globe. And, if you have read those editorials, then you’ll also know all about…

  • Food as a Weapon: Genetic Modification and Technocracy’s New Phase of Control

    Share this article

    Share this article PATRICK WOOD Technocracy expert Patrick Wood explores how “Food as a Weapon Against Civilians Is…

  • All Eyes Are on the WHO as They try to Take Over the World

    Share this article

    The World Health Organization circa 2023 is a villain. They are an excuse for money laundering and subjugating innocent people for the benefit and the convenience of the biggest oligarchs.
    They glorify themselves — but words are cheap, and we may be hurting — but we are not lobotomized. We have not forgotten what their “guidance” has done to…