Pandemic Treaty negotiators conclude their week-long meeting in Geneva right now without an agreement. Ding Dong the Treaty is dead!

Share this article

The continuation of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body's (INB's) "resumed" session of its 12th official meeting is yet another dud

Amid a desperate attempt to pull a rabbit out of a hat and conclude some kind of Pandemic Treaty this week, to be rapidly followed by a special WHO meeting of either the World Health Assembly or a Council of Ministers to adopt the Treaty—the best laid plans of mice and crooks have again fallen through.

After the 12th INB meeting in November, a “resumed” session was desperately planned for December 2-6, in an undisclosed scheme to get the Treaty adopted before Trump took office. You can see that this week’s “resumed” meeting was created hurriedly, ad hoc, after the failure of the November meeting. The schedule did not have a December meeting listed.

This week “stakeholders” were allowed into the INB meeting every morning to provide comments, then ushered out while small groups met in an attempt to iron out disagreements in a different format. It didn’t work.

Saved again. Meanwhile, the House Oversight Select Committee Report and its After-Action Review on the pandemic panned the Pandemic Treaty, saying it was bad for the US—and that if it was adopted, it should go through the Senate confirmation process.

Therefore, friends, I can assure you that at least for the US, the Pandemic Treaty is a total bust, the US will not become a party, and I take some credit (with the help of many many others) for that. The negotiators will continue their meetings through the end of May, but they know the US will not be a party, which puts a damper on their plans.

Now those of you in the rest of the world need to push your governments to do the same! We at Door to Freedom are happy to help!

 

Similar Posts

  • The “One Health” Agenda

    Share this article

    In today’s installment, we will examine the One Health agenda and how it threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom. 
    The term “One Health” was coined after the first SARS outbreak in the early 2000s to reflect the danger of new diseases emerging from human-animal contact. It refers to the idea of public health being not just about your health but also about animal and “planetary” health. It is framed in language designed to sound appealing and holistic.

  • Introduction: “Our Common Agenda” – Multilateralism With Teeth

    Share this article

    In September 2021, the UN Secretary-General António Guterres released the report Our Common Agenda.[1] The former Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfvén leads the UN panel that will provide proposals on how this agenda should be implemented. It is clear that the report comes as a direct response…

  • Happy Halloween

    Share this article

    Share this article Dear Friends, Happy Halloween! Amidst all the goblins and gremlins, I wanted to share an…

  • W.H.O. Do You Think You Are? – Exposing the Globalists’ W.H.O. Scheme | May 19th

    Share this article

    On Friday, 19 May 2023, the UK Column and Children’s Health Defense Europe hosted a joint symposium on the World Health Organisation. The exposé was moderated by Catherine Austin Fitts with outstanding line up of experts with wide variety of background and expertise. Catherine is the president of Solari, Inc., publisher of the…