Pandemic Treaty negotiators conclude their week-long meeting in Geneva right now without an agreement. Ding Dong the Treaty is dead!

Share this article

The continuation of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body's (INB's) "resumed" session of its 12th official meeting is yet another dud

Amid a desperate attempt to pull a rabbit out of a hat and conclude some kind of Pandemic Treaty this week, to be rapidly followed by a special WHO meeting of either the World Health Assembly or a Council of Ministers to adopt the Treaty—the best laid plans of mice and crooks have again fallen through.

After the 12th INB meeting in November, a “resumed” session was desperately planned for December 2-6, in an undisclosed scheme to get the Treaty adopted before Trump took office. You can see that this week’s “resumed” meeting was created hurriedly, ad hoc, after the failure of the November meeting. The schedule did not have a December meeting listed.

This week “stakeholders” were allowed into the INB meeting every morning to provide comments, then ushered out while small groups met in an attempt to iron out disagreements in a different format. It didn’t work.

Saved again. Meanwhile, the House Oversight Select Committee Report and its After-Action Review on the pandemic panned the Pandemic Treaty, saying it was bad for the US—and that if it was adopted, it should go through the Senate confirmation process.

Therefore, friends, I can assure you that at least for the US, the Pandemic Treaty is a total bust, the US will not become a party, and I take some credit (with the help of many many others) for that. The negotiators will continue their meetings through the end of May, but they know the US will not be a party, which puts a damper on their plans.

Now those of you in the rest of the world need to push your governments to do the same! We at Door to Freedom are happy to help!

 

Similar Posts

  • Notification Letter

    Share this article

    Share this article A letter sent from Frihedsbevægelsens Fællesråd notifying members of government in Denmark of the grave…

  • Who Funds the WHO? A Closer Look Behind the World Health Organization’s Budget

    Share this article

    “Voluntary contributions, specified and thematic, make up about 80% of the budget,” denoted former WHO medical officer and scientist Dr. @bell00david.

    “And this is important because specified contributions are contributions that are provided for a specific project in a specific place. They are very directive,” he explained.

  • Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands

    Share this article

    If you were expected to agree to an employment contract, would you not want to read it before signing? When you go to a restaurant, do you look at the menu before ordering your food or just eat whatever you happen to be given by the waiter? Or when buying a house or a car,..

  • SUPPORT:  Interstate Milk Freedom Act – HR 8374 

    Share this article

    Notwithstanding the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264), and any regulations or other guidance thereunder, a Federal department, agency, or court may not take any action (including any administrative, civil, criminal or other action) that would prohibit, interfere with, regulate, or otherwise restrict the interstate traffic of milk, or a milk product, that is unpasteurized and packaged for direct human consumption, if—