Pandemic Treaty negotiators conclude their week-long meeting in Geneva right now without an agreement. Ding Dong the Treaty is dead!

Share this article

The continuation of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body's (INB's) "resumed" session of its 12th official meeting is yet another dud

Amid a desperate attempt to pull a rabbit out of a hat and conclude some kind of Pandemic Treaty this week, to be rapidly followed by a special WHO meeting of either the World Health Assembly or a Council of Ministers to adopt the Treaty—the best laid plans of mice and crooks have again fallen through.

After the 12th INB meeting in November, a “resumed” session was desperately planned for December 2-6, in an undisclosed scheme to get the Treaty adopted before Trump took office. You can see that this week’s “resumed” meeting was created hurriedly, ad hoc, after the failure of the November meeting. The schedule did not have a December meeting listed.

This week “stakeholders” were allowed into the INB meeting every morning to provide comments, then ushered out while small groups met in an attempt to iron out disagreements in a different format. It didn’t work.

Saved again. Meanwhile, the House Oversight Select Committee Report and its After-Action Review on the pandemic panned the Pandemic Treaty, saying it was bad for the US—and that if it was adopted, it should go through the Senate confirmation process.

Therefore, friends, I can assure you that at least for the US, the Pandemic Treaty is a total bust, the US will not become a party, and I take some credit (with the help of many many others) for that. The negotiators will continue their meetings through the end of May, but they know the US will not be a party, which puts a damper on their plans.

Now those of you in the rest of the world need to push your governments to do the same! We at Door to Freedom are happy to help!

 

Similar Posts

  • Misinformation and Censorship

    Share this article

    One cannot watch much media these days without seeing a pundit from an elite journalistic or academic institution claim that this or that is “misinformation” or “disinformation.” Claims of misinformation and disinformation have blown up over the past five years.  While such claims appear to have the noble goal of spreading only factual information, do they really do so?…

  • Fearing ‘climate change,’ Ireland moves to kill the cows

    Share this article

    Ireland has announced plans to cull hundreds of thousands of cows to comply with European Union climate policy.  Similar initiatives in Belgium and the Netherlands ensure that beef prices will rise, but these proposals offer little environmental benefit.  Indeed, cows are the heroes, not the villains, in rescuing the climate.

  • The Sustainable Development Goals

    Share this article

    The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the basis of Agenda 2030, a collection of seventeen interlinked objectives, adopted as a resolution by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 2015.  They are described as a “shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future.”[1]  The UN Secretary-General’s intention…

  • Hungarian Translation

    Share this article

    Share this article New: Why is Everyone Concerned About the WHO? Miért aggódik mindenki a WHO miatt? Other…